From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28AD214EC7D for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726861790; cv=none; b=P/7JBeGjuazrm8yerKQ0iNZZlKVBEL7F8F0YMZydQ+jCtWUPiIfehprUMc19hrDeNAb5Cd7Gx65+BtoKR7ikBewGBnj/7yqrZcW3fx2jEFzD60QPoGO0/5PLW/qlfwvrzDtp8PCBsTJ5KFaIpLA76l7GaduawnSDJAbGZ/Sl/f4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726861790; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lzULtvJNviYSHBUrZsP0Uaa6eSRipEqOqj7S4yRHhjw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V0tJkLnmM3pbpEjDLIYUvUuJcc/ECgkvEsyBBRfhE/QWmODArm/Z0LQgOUnAh/bQMjU3CDDUJcY1gHeHxRfnS+ljyP9ri0HT5nl1j3rzAdzHqDYFOtyyRz5XX8SANwx7jLVs1AzABQNE6gXZQHWPMiE8LIctPZ/1S6WIz2Wrnt8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=clCDnn2U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="clCDnn2U" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD4D1E464; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:49:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=lzULtvJNviYSHBUrZsP0Uaa6eSRipEqOqj7S4y RHhjw=; b=clCDnn2Ub8AbTIhDQhrD+TzJVAh9M1/vGyjHJUDsgRjWYaCV17lspF x8m8FYHqlyKt8BaCpIxKGvBargJsxBsbDNZDstmCsDfXtlrLXWrT7pqjOLXLBYSM ZWKpt7/qf49n+E8nIlUm4c/UQUGMllrUdOZsmYpgFBatFD6K91Ehc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F481E463; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:49:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.108.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E7851E462; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:49:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TOPIC 10/11] Project Tracking In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:41:34 -0700") References: Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:49:46 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7DB0B11A-7789-11EF-912E-9B0F950A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Junio C Hamano writes: > Yes, either forward or backward. Having to keep a series that looks > potentially worth doing for weeks on 'seen' without getting any > movement is *VERY* painful. Would it motivate more experienced > contributors to review and express either support or refusal if I > more frequently, say after 20 days since its latest round got queued > on 'seen', a topic that does not seem to get enough support to be > merged to 'next' and is not getting rerolled? Missing verb was "discard". Instead of keeping the stalled topic, perhaps I should more actively discard them (people are allowed to send in a fresh iteration if they care enough)? Sorry for the noise.