From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C6146BF for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722023326; cv=none; b=CoVUNAJ4JgmeC1/E+VQRTzYhnVZpV+PYDGi9QoIDoFr6o1O8826ob6SxNZkWK7Bn2drNr0HK9VVnjdwPLhVQQxRY3BI3fyA/RJQd4KfZgEAK4850xDxlejr68UGIy1rFOAeVISQInVBMxmolVCxXjVIHxmsimJG2Iqr/SD5PcLg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722023326; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z2aD26aORFZsmEc8bKDjsLNphB4NJYNHwHFrDF5XJrA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=e8sGAXWQkyt3Q8Qu7N/gFpiQxbkpolCZw1lLm1lvvUzn0IfXrQ6w8lud2o9KW0c8m/m1WiHAoo5beRupK5xwrSzg/qJxI9L69CJv0lD5y6tHtqcwJm5o1/uc1ubfzVXMzHI5tGpAMMpqps195xzeRaFKfCpzWOoSJkes3ABkBKg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=VXMNE6qB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="VXMNE6qB" Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272212862F; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:48:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Z2aD26aORFZs mEc8bKDjsLNphB4NJYNHwHFrDF5XJrA=; b=VXMNE6qBLKXYbuIuymRGnLmK9d7E RJjyFEreqvntOhyMCCFVNxp4SxN3A0gN4fi8h9X5d38coKUuuL6Ljm+ULEonZc31 18OOWRUny1n8dldqUp/GVQl3jLMCt4lg0ygoOYueLzU5QcYy9S+2hQTtiH/fJM58 FhPOYxSCjd7an1s= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F66B2862E; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:48:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.139.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75AEE2862C; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:48:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?Q?Rub=C3=A9n?= Justo Cc: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk, Git List Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH v2 0/2] add-p P fixups In-Reply-To: <1dc4cb5d-966a-402f-a880-42280750b949@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Rub=C3=A9n?= Justo"'s message of "Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:22:15 +0200") References: <7c9ec43d-f52f-49b7-b1f3-fe3c85554006@gmail.com> <62af789f-ca19-4f11-9339-a97400f7e70c@gmail.com> <2333cb14-f020-451c-ad14-3f30edd152ec@gmail.com> <5735bee3-0532-4894-b717-12a0bdcb9e84@gmail.com> <97902c27-63c9-4537-8ebe-853ef0cb1d3b@gmail.com> <24e83a0f-b0c8-4cd5-b321-1d7702b844ce@gmail.com> <1dc4cb5d-966a-402f-a880-42280750b949@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:48:34 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0C40D1CC-4B88-11EF-A039-92D9AF168FA5-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rub=C3=A9n Justo writes: > I thought it wasn't necessary to modify the first two, which remain > correct, and I didn't want to bring them up again. Additionally, > keeping the dates of the first two different from the two modified here > could be interesting. Then at least you should have said so. From the receiving end, that and retracting the first two would look the same, so there needs to be some clue to let the receiver tell which one is the case. Thanks.