From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B8A145B00 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 21:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721339881; cv=none; b=j58Tc17jCaZWZLUsnnaPKgW6TnlcRkqKvNaI2ONfYRiA9akw6IpT82+uj2PcKm4foA3QhT7up9coFHZ+GqHdQeM9kqjAHio6hDGEcp/WEsUnbH1Ag7AE0J8IW6IzU8QcO3m+BLteWS3JAYviMKevqdXvSe+ZJG1EdW7rILj7Zr4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721339881; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6XhxOzoNH6CWJhmob+a1rwlKEJZzX5oP9qG01dvS2F4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=l8wz51/ydJMGU2cLvnWNiZkq/qXQhwOjTYyPT/isrFxzE0KQoWFGwc3xTsI14nB231iEt7xiec7f0PfXKvKRVpc0xhZMxoKeCD839IRia7ljCq/GFC5pxpxR7HJXwLtfrY8C/LhoZy+h9F6OXPQyWs3reKt5XNxV78WmyH8iRTc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=XJA8xJOk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="XJA8xJOk" Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0156E2E260; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 17:58:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=6XhxOzoNH6CWJhmob+a1rwlKEJZzX5oP9qG01d vS2F4=; b=XJA8xJOkNtg1pk62U1brv0+nNe6XUZUuvTVadMbOEssFghKVDTugBn +u/LPQ2yjsqPiqEBCgNwCm7Y1NTzSeU0g0UDWKK2iyztA493L4tqOF7DBaZNikYu lr6s8npTVrKEvhnh8N32Gsfw2vX4QU7bTQfVEN+lWeqcCjLgLukKg= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB7C2E25F; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 17:57:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.139.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 798012E25E; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 17:57:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, me@ttayllorr.com, Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix background maintenance regression in Git 2.45.0 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2024 19:55:44 +0000") References: Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:57:55 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CA47306E-4550-11EF-8C70-92D9AF168FA5-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes: > Here is an issue I noticed while exploring issues with my local copy of a > large monorepo. I was intending to show some engineers how nice the objects > were maintained by background maintenance, but saw hundreds of small > pack-files that were up to two months old. This time matched when I upgraded > to the microsoft/git fork that included the 2.45.0 release of Git. I almost said "wow, perfect timing on the -rc1 day", but then realized that this is not a regression during _this_ cycle, but a cycle ago. You already Cc'ed Taylor, whom I would have asked for help if I were the one who found this issue, which is good. Will queue. Thanks.