From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CE8911CA0 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713387805; cv=none; b=UJYgUbHQAEeRNEozmipQS/aLrvMO5QgQ9HaBrHzX1DlSCxy6MiuTyW/FehKT2EnDQlagOEgRN8evu7aBiTeLWHe1FtseFXE8pFC5Na+CM9phHd7q5Mr3Uc+/bIir1jGK4EpDjbdZf27k3+R2rHUANJehmV36q7paNcZVWrKBrI0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713387805; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rUhlviApOHksDwPEJT/8TtR8SC/CGB0UHoy1B+nuSW8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fsh2nGp4Q0YGjpso/EPeBAM6O9agDxDGBA3rQbw06jg0SRXXd72BGpPy6GpW1CZbNr8LXav8nuigA8+QEYczXhy/lV8ez2as9pk4qeaftlmY/Q4AA+l2AltdqjMDDUr8nZL/4IReTyM2cvmTAuY2yg6ScJCTcq6WYpa8kc60M08= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=ZMOhLPaY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="ZMOhLPaY" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EF81DD3ED; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:03:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=rUhlviApOHksDwPEJT/8TtR8SC/CGB0UHoy1B+ nuSW8=; b=ZMOhLPaYnURLOFeUPuv7ExWrDMxn3JNq2iMEhD+/NON3w150x/rwo2 qfEj0A/hv4G3QSO+RAExMGLPpTHcfetvKWaZzMhcZzPMig+rQHt0wsjZXpgfpgK+ hOjLnDvbWo7tl6rnIXEaqz4LXn1LagAshXXxiGHJUq08mRVtea0Ak= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D661DD3EC; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:03:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.229.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 812F31DD3EB; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:03:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Dragan Simic Cc: Phillip Wood , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] format-patch: new --resend option for adding "RESEND" to patch subjects In-Reply-To: (Dragan Simic's message of "Wed, 17 Apr 2024 19:34:09 +0200") References: <1d9c6ce3df714211889453c245485d46b43edff6.1713324598.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <154b085c-3e92-4eb6-b6a6-97aa02f8f07d@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:03:16 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E9DB40FA-FCFD-11EE-89E9-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Dragan Simic writes: > With all due respect, "--rfc=WIP" looks like a kludge, simply > because "--rfc" should, IIUC, be some kind of a fixed shorthand. I wouldn't use "should" there. In any case, we are not going to add unbounded number of --wip, --resend, etc., on top of what we have already. Introducing --something={WIP,RESEND,RFC,HACK,...} and deprecating --rfc is not something I would object to, though. Thanks.