From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C584A31 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 01:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712971628; cv=none; b=qokVpxO6g1SpdvnVrShI0uj89ITeOFuZJeTjGrZPB7AVLLGYiQKu2oRw8fvBqUTl6zSmLFZqq1jvKwDvPWPix7xtRvzkRtLWJ1O4C0kv8U4+o+eIQ30bl6Ez1m8yf9rVmJ0RoHXZGb/m/cMB2vm+Km8YXkBVnVRbFinz0jxQRD4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712971628; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4yXBotGw/TUzU0B8Nc/sALska4xe1q64VpKkZsCEg14=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=j0cTR5BL2gHhgduRt4DFGwnwxtFnsj4dS89U0vlPtkJmS+now9JOHB6aV5jfzWV3PwfdW+37xV9cMLFmND7eoHFMFQrNtcaln09R5t9hELkhE5T/SzLJpZpWPtdkCLdrh+R5WdoYzNaCUiOA/4prqfBXOWFOHE0w2YFo+GP1NIA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=CYnbo/5D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="CYnbo/5D" Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B054E336C4; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 21:27:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4yXBotGw/TUzU0B8Nc/sALska4xe1q64VpKkZs CEg14=; b=CYnbo/5D9YT69DfiCCE8IyBf9Q9WreoOOKbHpzXisJh7IhKjbihwo6 RnRpj4DqJUNXd5hllnbJtd7pXzSwS6OXw3Tbsnt4lHXsOK9FvK+fMsa1FniKjx5/ t4tbAAWQWbFQDRDpDI8oaE5jNFeGbZNyPTsdnZ8iUAl28av0c25Bs= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7204336C3; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 21:27:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.229.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E55F6336BB; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 21:27:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine Cc: Linus Arver via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Tan , Emily Shaffer , Patrick Steinhardt , Matthieu Moy , Kipras Melnikovas , Linus Arver Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] SubmittingPatches: clarify 'git-contacts' location In-Reply-To: (Eric Sunshine's message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:45:48 -0400") References: Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:26:59 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: ED47B754-F934-11EE-B848-A19503B9AAD1-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Eric Sunshine writes: > An alternative would be to deprecate and/or remove `git-contacts` from > "contrib" and instead point people at Felipe's `git-related`[1], which > is the direct parent[2] of `git-contacts`, as well as a more > functional drop-in replacement for `git-contacts`. I am not sure it is wise to add an external dependency on a tool that is not very well known ([1] has only 68 stars), not packaged for distros [*] and is more or less dormant (the last update was April last year). Unless the one we locally carry is vastly inadequate in comparison, I somehow doubt that it is a better alternative to ask our target audience to use it, than letting them use git-contacts from in-tree. [Footnote] * "git imerge" and "tig" are what I compare with to use as a yardstick, when trying to judge how well-known and easily obtainable a package related to us is.