git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] repository.h: drop unused `gc_cruft_packs`
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:19:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqlein7bwt.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c67ee7c2ff9456eda1c5468cf68ddb1b83d37c85.1681850424.git.me@ttaylorr.com> (Taylor Blau's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:41:00 -0400")

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:

> As of the previous commit, all callers that need to read the value of
> `gc.cruftPacks` do so outside without using the `repo_settings` struct,
> making its `gc_cruft_packs` unused. Drop it accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
> ---
>  repo-settings.c | 4 +---
>  repository.h    | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

This is in line with the current design of repo-settings, and it is
a total tangent to this topic, but in retrospect, if we structured
how "what's experimental" is determined in a more distributed way,
we didn't have to have this patch.  That is, instead of saying "ok
we are in a repository with experimental setting turned on, and the
set of features to be enabled are centrally described in this
settings structure", each opt-in features (like the code that reads
"gc.cruftPacks" by calling git_config_get_bool() to override its
default value) can select their default/fallback values by seeing if
the experimental bit is set.

In any case, this patch looks good and we have one fewer such
centrally managed bit.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-04-19 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17 20:54 [PATCH 00/10] gc: enable cruft packs by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] pack-write.c: plug a leak in stage_tmp_packfiles() Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:30   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:40     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] builtin/repack.c: fix incorrect reference to '-C' Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] builtin/gc.c: ignore cruft packs with `--keep-largest-pack` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 22:54   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-17 23:03     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:39       ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 14:54         ` Derrick Stolee
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] t/t5304-prune.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] t/t9300-fast-import.sh: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:43   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:44     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: refactor cruft pack tests Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: add additional test cases Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:48   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:48     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] t/t6501-freshen-objects.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:56   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:50     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-22 11:23       ` Jeff King
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 11:00   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:52     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] repository.h: drop unused `gc_cruft_packs` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 11:02   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 11:04 ` [PATCH 00/10] gc: enable cruft packs by default Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:53   ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 01/10] pack-write.c: plug a leak in stage_tmp_packfiles() Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 16:31       ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-20 16:57         ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] builtin/repack.c: fix incorrect reference to '-C' Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 03/10] builtin/gc.c: ignore cruft packs with `--keep-largest-pack` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 04/10] t/t5304-prune.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 05/10] t/t6501-freshen-objects.sh: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 06/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: refactor cruft pack tests Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 07/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: add additional test cases Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 08/10] t/t9300-fast-import.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40   ` [PATCH v2 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled " Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 17:24       ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-20 17:31         ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 19:19           ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:41   ` [PATCH v2 10/10] repository.h: drop unused `gc_cruft_packs` Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:19     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqlein7bwt.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).