From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Hans Jerry Illikainen <hji@dyntopia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tests: make RUNTIME_PREFIX compatible with --valgrind
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:22:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqlevydqll.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patch-1.4-315da7c2df0-20220421T200733Z-avarab@gmail.com> ("Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason"'s message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2022 22:14:34 +0200")
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tests: make RUNTIME_PREFIX compatible with --valgrind
The patch text looks more like
tests: --valgrind does not work with RUNTIME_PREFIX
to me. Is it true that a test that only works with RUNTIME_PREFIX
does not work under --valgrind at all? I am wondering if we can do
this without introducing a new prerequisite, and if it makes sense
to do so if it can be done. The output from
$ git grep 'test_expect_success .*RUNTIME_PREFIX' t/
tells me that there are two test pieces that must be run under
RUNTIME_PREFIX, and this patch touches both of them.
I guess it is not RUNTIME_PREFIX build itself per-se, but it is
the way we test RUNTIME_PREFIX is incompatible with how we run our
tests under --valgrind, so neither the title on the Subject: header
of this message or "looks more like" above is a good one. It is
more like
tests: using custom GIT_EXEC_PATH breaks --valgrind tests
I think.
And after having looked at the patch text and thought about the
issues enough to come up with the above updated title, I can say
that the change looks quite reasonable, both the body of the
proposed log message and the solution. Nicely done.
It would have been even nicer if I didn't have to think about the
issues myself, though ;-)
Thanks.
> Fix a regression in b7d11a0f5d2 (tests: exercise the RUNTIME_PREFIX
> feature, 2021-07-24) where tests that want to set up and test a "git"
> wrapper in $PATH conflicted with the t/bin/valgrind wrapper(s) doing
> the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> ---
> t/t0060-path-utils.sh | 4 ++--
> t/test-lib.sh | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> index 2fe6ae6a4e5..aa35350b6f3 100755
> --- a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> +++ b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ test_lazy_prereq CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD '
> ./git rev-parse
> '
>
> -test_expect_success RUNTIME_PREFIX,CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD 'RUNTIME_PREFIX works' '
> +test_expect_success !VALGRIND,RUNTIME_PREFIX,CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD 'RUNTIME_PREFIX works' '
> mkdir -p pretend/bin pretend/libexec/git-core &&
> echo "echo HERE" | write_script pretend/libexec/git-core/git-here &&
> cp "$GIT_EXEC_PATH"/git$X pretend/bin/ &&
> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ test_expect_success RUNTIME_PREFIX,CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD 'RUNTIME_PREFIX works' '
> echo HERE >expect &&
> test_cmp expect actual'
>
> -test_expect_success RUNTIME_PREFIX,CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD '%(prefix)/ works' '
> +test_expect_success !VALGRIND,RUNTIME_PREFIX,CAN_EXEC_IN_PWD '%(prefix)/ works' '
> mkdir -p pretend/bin &&
> cp "$GIT_EXEC_PATH"/git$X pretend/bin/ &&
> git config yes.path "%(prefix)/yes" &&
> diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
> index 531cef097db..7f3d323e937 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -1666,6 +1666,7 @@ test -n "$USE_LIBPCRE2" && test_set_prereq PCRE
> test -n "$USE_LIBPCRE2" && test_set_prereq LIBPCRE2
> test -z "$NO_GETTEXT" && test_set_prereq GETTEXT
> test -n "$SANITIZE_LEAK" && test_set_prereq SANITIZE_LEAK
> +test -n "$GIT_VALGRIND_ENABLED" && test_set_prereq VALGRIND
>
> if test -z "$GIT_TEST_CHECK_CACHE_TREE"
> then
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-21 20:14 [PATCH 0/4] Fix issues and a regression noted by valgrind Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-21 20:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] tests: make RUNTIME_PREFIX compatible with --valgrind Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-21 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-04-21 20:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] log test: skip a failing mkstemp() test under valgrind Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-21 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] commit-graph.c: don't assume that stat() succeeds Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-21 22:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-21 20:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] object-file: fix a unpack_loose_header() regression in 3b6a8db3b03 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-21 22:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-22 8:21 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-12 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] test fixes around valgrind Junio C Hamano
2022-05-12 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] tests: using custom GIT_EXEC_PATH breaks --valgrind tests Junio C Hamano
2022-05-12 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] log test: skip a failing mkstemp() test under valgrind Junio C Hamano
2022-05-12 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] commit-graph.c: don't assume that stat() succeeds Junio C Hamano
2022-05-12 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] object-file: fix a unpack_loose_header() regression in 3b6a8db3b03 Junio C Hamano
2022-05-12 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-16 14:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-05-19 20:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Alternate ab/valgrind-fixes fix-up Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-19 20:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] object-file API: fix obscure unpack_loose_header() return Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-19 20:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] object-file API: have unpack_loose_header() return "int" again Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-20 4:27 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqlevydqll.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hji@dyntopia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).