From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C34C11F64 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC79A61220 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232266AbhF1RkW (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:40:22 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64578 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229504AbhF1RkW (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:40:22 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97CBC1DC7; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:37:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=aZCQUQzLdxPGKZZnbwTQjiyiRWh1mPV1tKQCLb LfDss=; b=HOubF/NN32X+xnk7rZTqTdz0USkSFbI5n+eAguw5sBm1T1AyoUAMuV FZOubzPn1vFseNEUIjWJIav0/2Sb8RkbtWLRtP/rEuScYqNGC7pG9HKdMMg9tBpi GekIwWXmP8hROP4g7EYsSIdQlCidlOwOzRNos3K4hLe9bK0I1al1w= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F74C1DC6; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:37:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.3.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64DC8C1DC5; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:37:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Contreras , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] help: colorize man pages if man.color=true under less(1) References: <87mtrj2faq.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:37:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:58:56 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 924D8318-D837-11EB-A9A7-8B3BC6D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I'm still entirely unconvinced that this should be in Git at all; > pointing GIT_MAN_VIEWER or man.*.cmd at a color-man wrapper seems like > it would be sufficient. But it feels like that conversation was not > going anywhere productive; I mention it here only to indicate that my > response above is not an endorsement of the concept. I have the same reaction to the patch.