From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FEAC00A89 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4C322268 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="YhuJFzNs" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726026AbgKCAcQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:32:16 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:61474 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725932AbgKCAcQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:32:16 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7782F1030BF; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:32:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=mID16z8BFWnA oTpRln0EFmKlKhk=; b=YhuJFzNsXfFuoyMiq+IEdlyKfkjmBBvYeFYY8q6yE/Ds nHPBDzMtyzt+7igO62wXLTEfI4do3PAYq+/wsWzqluZNY0UPe6apz4dU3XYtbfSC d070JnCKBgJd0zr4D6uIuw+rKdKKAcgtV3kgKIK3Saxv+XdiNbdx4OXpmCdOZl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xAROoi 1rklBljzNzGxSnLlBK/+ohFdBkErj+RioVbngi3YfcGDud8hTxTdwvQIPm8NNLl5 2mU0qbidOcRAuzJlccjlDVgDokfZn/psDn1aQdgUBw2P4cDJGpbdnPiQJWaZPRjw bw6aEW4LF3003hs+UFXq/umR3VmA3AgrBL0/k= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705F51030BD; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:32:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5BC21030BC; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:32:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Alban Gruin Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood Subject: Re: ag/merge-strategies-in-c, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2020, #04; Tue, 27) References: <693f417c-5612-7878-a055-2810f62af3b4@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 16:32:10 -0800 In-Reply-To: <693f417c-5612-7878-a055-2810f62af3b4@gmail.com> (Alban Gruin's message of "Mon, 2 Nov 2020 23:31:12 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 037A2992-1D6C-11EB-91E3-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Alban Gruin writes: >> I just went back to the thread. >>=20 >> https://lore.kernel.org/git/20201005122646.27994-1-alban.gruin@gmail.c= om/ >>=20 >> It seems that the topic saw quite a few comments and help by Phillip >> Wood in its earliest iteration, but I didn't see any review from >> those other than myself on the last iteration v3, and the review >> comments on the iteration haven't been acted upon yet. >>=20 >> That was why I threw the topic in "needs review" bucket. The later >> half of the series got no comments (I lost steam after reviewing the >> earlier half) and I suspect they would have be adjusted for fixes >> and improvements done to polish the earlier parts, so I am not sure >> where your "ready for 'next'" comes from. >>=20 >> Thanks. > > Sorry, I am short on time to work on this these days, but I=E2=80=99m s= till > planning to apply Junio=E2=80=99s latest suggestions. So I agree with = you, this > is not yet ready for `next'. Thanks for a status update. Be well and happy hacking ;-)