From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDEFC43464 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B4420717 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="GaWXMCKN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726390AbgIQUEO (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:04:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56085 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726328AbgIQUEN (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:04:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD5D6890D; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:52:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=UjtvM5cx0x/Ulbx6N28ognDzt/A=; b=GaWXMC KNcTIl55uPwfS0Fi7OfkwxYUegmubUwa3SDzR2bSghbfwbbTB69UMca7B1sg5NOB zk5mwOcjOmXHv93ZgpiWtz82k9AcqSy8rXm0pjlD3ajP3TaYoITl6nuGJYCaCLCj scvj9hNtKProQmR4YRHyN9HweBjhGyil1Tw7M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=uj7pwCWgbkLv3Fs7LT3IV6qyoq4Zag6A e3nE85GXsAfmdehTO4IqjwU/oDh2zgRSqjEYNdDQlO9fSfPJBDxKeYEDjsnPm052 CraQWdcvxd6W7MQO7IB2ijE+wd7nu9Gf7l8Yr+zDBgCCc9iBJmh3TQniZVALqTFl ChuGLkIbJno= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D816890C; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:52:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.190.152.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DE7768908; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:52:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2020, #04; Wed, 16) References: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 12:52:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:47:38 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5CB235E8-F91F-11EA-9165-2F5D23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > * ab/mediawiki-fixes (2020-09-16) 15 commits > - remote-mediawiki tests: annotate failing tests > - remote-mediawiki: fix duplicate revisions being imported > - remote-mediawiki tests: use CLI installer > - remote-mediawiki tests: use inline PerlIO for readability > - remote-mediawiki tests: replace deprecated Perl construct > - remote-mediawiki tests: use a more idiomatic dispatch table > - remote-mediawiki tests: use "$dir/" instead of "$dir." > - remote-mediawiki tests: change `[]` to `test` > - remote-mediawiki tests: guard test_cmp with test_path_is_file > - remote-mediawiki tests: use test_cmp in tests > - remote-mediawiki tests: use a 10 character password > - remote-mediawiki tests: use the login/password variables > - remote-mediawiki doc: bump recommended PHP version to 7.3 > - remote-mediawiki doc: link to MediaWiki's current version > - remote-mediawiki doc: correct link to GitHub project > > Modernization and fixes to MediaWiki remote backend. > > Will merge to 'next'. This series goes in good direction, but I think there were a few good suggestions for improvement in the review. I'll mark it as "expecting a reroll" instead. Thanks.