From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] test-lib: simplify lsan results check
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 08:23:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmsg2vbi1.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107070752.GB584668@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 7 Jan 2025 02:07:52 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> We want to know if there are any leaks logged by LSan in the results
> directory, so we run "find" on the containing directory and pipe it to
> xargs. We can accomplish the same thing by just globbing in the shell
> and passing the result to grep, which has a few advantages:
>
> - it's one fewer process to run
> ...
> We are now subject to command-line length limits, but that is also true
> of the globbing cat used to show the logs themselves. This hasn't been a
> problem in practice.
Nice to see it mentioned here. And the resulting code does become
simpler to reason about.
> We do need to use "grep -s" for the case that the glob does not expand
> (i.e., there are not any log files at all). This option is in POSIX, and
> has been used in t7407 for several years without anybody complaining.
Also since c625bf0e (git-p4: git-p4 tests with p4 triggers,
2017-07-13) t9831 has also been using it. It is not like a stray
error message about unmatched glob would really matter here, though.
We are not doing 2>&1 to let the downstream of the pipe see it, and
unless the test is run under "-v" option, it wouldn't even be seen.
> This also also naturally handles the case where the surrounding
> directory has already been removed (in which case there are likewise no
> files!), dropping the need to comment about it.
Nice.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-30 17:33 What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2024, #11; Mon, 30) Junio C Hamano
2024-12-31 17:27 ` René Scharfe
2025-01-03 7:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-01 19:14 ` a less-invasive racy-leak fix, was " Jeff King
2025-01-01 20:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] a less-invasive racy-leak fix Jeff King
2025-01-01 20:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] test-lib: use individual lsan dir for --stress runs Jeff King
2025-01-01 20:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] Revert "index-pack: spawn threads atomically" Jeff King
2025-01-01 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] test-lib: rely on logs to detect leaks Jeff King
2025-01-03 12:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-03 20:10 ` Jeff King
2025-01-01 20:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] test-lib: simplify leak-log checking Jeff King
2025-01-03 12:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-03 20:24 ` Jeff King
2025-01-06 7:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-07 7:01 ` Jeff King
2025-01-01 20:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] test-lib: check leak logs for presence of DEDUP_TOKEN Jeff King
2025-01-01 20:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] test-lib: ignore leaks in the sanitizer's thread code Jeff King
2025-01-03 12:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-03 20:26 ` Jeff King
2025-01-06 7:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-07 7:04 ` [PATCH 0/3] lsan test-lib readability Jeff King
2025-01-07 7:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] test-lib: invert return value of check_test_results_san_file_empty Jeff King
2025-01-07 7:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] test-lib: simplify lsan results check Jeff King
2025-01-07 7:37 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-09 7:57 ` Jeff King
2025-01-09 10:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-07 16:23 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-01-09 7:59 ` Jeff King
2025-01-07 7:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] test-lib: add a few comments to LSan log checking Jeff King
2025-01-07 7:37 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-02 0:25 ` a less-invasive racy-leak fix, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2024, #11; Mon, 30) Junio C Hamano
2025-01-02 2:32 ` Jeff King
2025-01-02 2:41 ` Chris Torek
2025-01-02 14:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-02 19:06 ` Jeff King
2025-01-02 19:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-02 3:24 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqmsg2vbi1.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).