From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9AC12FB6 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 01:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732151413; cv=none; b=fT3TSTuSdK2mZfR98gvUYGLoPmnXiWPkxUt1NszZ4Tmq5W0WC4wMnAXf9a5yky/4n7919kxfN1gTFCIcogTOUduEIZVkT6HbmSDFbPHl4M9HWVyX/BsSK3KfslVcmgJ7xWG+TUdwQ6qrV0/ks2mATEDgqBPxdeyEvM/BurbLlps= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732151413; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A0xLcaLMVJ2MvNf7ytBPvJTRn9BaC3J3RCI1LmJ7H3Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=e1B+hZqvu8Jp0A1rGtia3swa0UwlrAq57BSwHS3KjgdBOQo4r4kCNu2bW98mcZXyGMvcw3E1+pDxkMmy15c3LZOytkU4GiJhp9se1kV67KoY/aICYrxQP2hpJQL/A9IPhEv3jfSaS2kcowZhhlsm0nF1LHf6S8PWImnrschDFio= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=ZHUQ3IsZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="ZHUQ3IsZ" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9263825400F6; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:10:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:10:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1732151409; x=1732237809; bh=Og7ebRfEKKUWUzgFXYcbZ6nrSQbHW15cw+W IQths71Y=; b=ZHUQ3IsZ58P4FUJAP+WqXAyAc1UyC2Wt1AxkYNmCTa83qxM2C/j xCHd/y5L0O71KCAkA+0H9Me8x/tPIxGwhi8sXg4YIwKHTTqwNB1lXRp+2bqspO85 SynrYJfHVln6gBQbc4EyA9TTpCqcvxoPG/zpFNMVzosYRVpWHpL3hgsaPcktr36W JBkNtY+KdIv6l4gLfgtUph2hJWzWfeoLr6dRc+h57C5qEGdpNeSTY+h09ZNIfyCQ H2k6WxMDdpu559B4WVSG4L0I1AKzbckdnIKSvlo7nPRnpMyVj8fOH445UvsRGgW0 FX0FM6xAt4e3Ia3iJiUYdjaiCbiIHXS7EGA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrfeehgdefudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnth hsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecu hfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrd gtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetffegkedtkeehtdeuhfdtheeliedvvdekuefh jefhteefieeuhfduvefhkeduleenucffohhmrghinhepshhhohhrthhlohhgrdhpshdpth hhrghnkhhsrdhpshdpmhhishhtrghkvghnrdgttgdpuhhprdhsjhenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsoh igrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeeipdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphht thhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlh drohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegthhhrihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhesghhmrghilhdr tghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehshhgvjhhirghluhhosehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpth htohepshhtohhlvggvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhes phhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:10:08 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder , shejialuo , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2024, #07; Wed, 20) In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:36:10 +0100") References: Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:10:07 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:49:34PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ps/gc-stale-lock-warning (2024-11-20) 1 commit > ... > I'm never quite sure whether I should speak of the command or the code > unit in this edge case, but this message here seems to indicate that it > would be preferable to mention the actual command instead. Either is probably fine, but when the commit describes a fix or an update to an end-user observable behaviour, the command name would make a better label to appear in "git shortlog". >> * ps/send-pack-unhide-error-in-atomic-push (2024-11-15) 6 commits > ... > I'll review this patch series later this week. Thanks. >> * ps/leakfixes-part-10 (2024-11-13) 28 commits >> ... >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <20241111-b4-pks-leak-fixes-pt10-v2-0-6154bf91f0b0@pks.im> > > Toon left another comment that I'll want to have a look at before > merging this to "next". I guess we now have a hopefully final reroll, which I saw and picked up. >> * ds/path-walk-1 (2024-11-11) 6 commits >> - path-walk: mark trees and blobs as UNINTERESTING >> - path-walk: visit tags and cached objects >> - path-walk: allow consumer to specify object types >> - t6601: add helper for testing path-walk API >> - test-lib-functions: add test_cmp_sorted >> - path-walk: introduce an object walk by path >> >> Introduce a new API to visit objects in batches based on a common >> path, or by type. >> >> Comments? >> source: > > I think what's interesting in this case is the incompatibility between > the path-walk API and bitmaps. It seems like there is some push back > based on this, but from my point of view the path-walk API still has > uses where bitmaps don't matter that much, like in the proposed new > git-backfill and git-survey tools. Both of which are of interest to me. Yup, I didn't have a chance to carefully read what the new code does yet, and didn't get an impression that anybody did either for v1 or v2, but I may be mistaken. >> * cc/promisor-remote-capability (2024-09-10) 4 commits > ... > Chris is currently writing such a doc that tries to clarify the bigger > picture. So I guess we can evict this topic for now, start to discuss > the vision and then once we're all on the same page start to think > re-submit the topic. > > I've Cc'd him in case he disagrees with me. Then I'll wait for Christian to speak up. >> * sj/ref-contents-check (2024-11-15) 9 commits >> ... > I've already reviewed this version and expect a (probably final) reroll. Thanks, I saw that (hopefully) final reroll and picked it up. Thanks.