From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39EFB7347D for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717785765; cv=none; b=M/0/gc9/c/pmVn7+CEK+YQLDwRMuKevgOk5HmMy59j4D1czPwRsqFZJsL5pCeA8jW9seoUYF56rsHFQrj76z1hbNZklKDvvFE9yFdA7V8vuW6fgbAAYHTCV0uRmZek4h6VDwvTv5/ijRQTwQtc6pRW9X+3ZCw6k/4y1ram7toWY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717785765; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ReWo6KoW0DWd1SOlNq1hIrOkoW9iR8sR/KUZYd9UyLo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nahfVyhvAv8pFU4nzyoZ5UGNXSZZdl9o3Co3S4I9Lnzx/wu/IgiO4TGO8vobS1tplUE6tttObuEaCuYsbzAplgmPmwy1Uqk+VnqBTJ2N6z6NY6FYbTTLBAuUrOnJ7eDrWnzKEXxIFbP8XX8Y3Qc10ks5l2/Vsx9e190hP3oljMU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=bVhK5lhX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="bVhK5lhX" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E524C3050E; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:42:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ReWo6KoW0DWd1SOlNq1hIrOkoW9iR8sR/KUZYd 9UyLo=; b=bVhK5lhXpWYDM1ZUe7RTYyvSBDc6LyDktBdCJDLK9ldm+hPsaXuLJ7 pIwEOKe4uXxFOcwjN+hKty/ZoxyDeuH5u7icXIhjaA6C6b3i1aZAGOGDik/moHPJ f+VMFnWnGAjb/DuFeaHOUOJRpTnAi1S01micun1g74Aj8K7j/d/zc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC30A3050D; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:42:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.204.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C92B3050C; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:42:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ci: let pedantic job compile with -Og In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Fri, 7 Jun 2024 07:10:05 +0200") References: <351dec4a4d5a5619e7627e11a8e674e32125125e.1717655210.git.ps@pks.im> <20240606065236.GA646308@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 11:42:41 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B924F776-24FD-11EF-B77D-6488940A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Patrick Steinhardt writes: >> Speaking of variants, is there any interest in migrating one or some >> of the existing x86-64 CI jobs to arm64 CI jobs GitHub introduced >> recently? I suspect that we won't find any endianness bugs (I >> expect they are configured to do little endian just like everybody >> else) and there may no longer be lurking unaligned read bugs (but >> "git log --grep=unaligned" finds surprising number of them we have >> seen and fixed), so the returns may be very small. > > Note that we already run arm64 via GitLab's macOS runners. That's not > Linux of course, but I guess that any architectural issues should still > be caught by that. The more the merrier and it is nice to know we have extra variety over there. > Not to say that we shouldn't adapt GitHub. ;-)