git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] reftable/stack: refactor stack reloading to have common exit path
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:30:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmstdccz8.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01ece2626dd4cb494829e146d99c172fa8428478.1704714575.git.ps@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:18:31 +0100")

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> The `reftable_stack_reload_maybe_reuse()` function is responsible for
> reloading the reftable list from disk. The function is quite hard to
> follow though because it has a bunch of different exit paths, many of
> which have to free the same set of resources.
>
> Refactor the function to have a common exit path. While at it, touch up
> the style of this function a bit to match our usual coding style better.
> ---
>  reftable/stack.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

Missing sign-off.

Other than that, I did not find anything questionable in the
conversion.  By sticking to the two simple invariants:

 - we use "err" as our return value when we jump to "out:"

 - we always keep "names" and "names_after" freeable, and free them
   when we jump to "out:".

the exit status and leak prevention are both very clear (and the
behaviour is not changed---it is not like there are any existing
leaks that are plugged by this restructuring of the loop).


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-10 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-08 12:18 [PATCH 0/4] reftable: optimize I/O patterns Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-08 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] reftable/stack: refactor stack reloading to have common exit path Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-10 17:30   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-01-11  7:33     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-08 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] reftable/stack: refactor reloading to use file descriptor Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-10 19:57   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-08 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] reftable/stack: use stat info to avoid re-reading stack list Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-10 20:07   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-11  7:41     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-08 12:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] reftable/blocksource: use mmap to read tables Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-10 21:24   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-11  9:21     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-11 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] reftable: optimize I/O patterns Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-11 10:06   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] reftable/stack: refactor stack reloading to have common exit path Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-11 10:06   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] reftable/stack: refactor reloading to use file descriptor Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-14 10:14     ` Jeff King
2024-01-15 10:03       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-16 15:14         ` Jeff King
2024-01-16 16:44           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-11 10:06   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] reftable/stack: use stat info to avoid re-reading stack list Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-11 10:06   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] reftable/blocksource: refactor code to match our coding style Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-11 10:06   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] reftable/blocksource: use mmap to read tables Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqmstdccz8.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hanwenn@gmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).