git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Cc: "Jason Yundt" <jason@jasonyundt.email>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gitweb: switch to an XHTML5 DOCTYPE
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 15:09:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmteuiuos.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YpkwD1op18MY/qBa@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> (brian m. carlson's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2022 21:47:59 +0000")

"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:

>> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gitweb: switch to an XHTML5 DOCTYPE
>> ...
>> > 2. mentions HTML5 like Bagas suggested.
>> 
>> So, is it XHTML5, or HTML5, we want to see on the title?
>
> It's XHTML 5.  Technically, it's the XML syntax of HTML 5, so I don't
> think we care much about the nit here.

I too don't care either way very much.

I just noticed the discrepancy between the title and the body, but
the mention of HTML5 is after the three-dash lines so nobody gets
hurt anyway ;-)

> We _could_ make this check for beginning of file, the XML declaration,
> and then the specified lines (e.g., with head(1)), but I don't really
> think that's necessary. We should be fine here for now, and if we decide
> we need that in the future, we can add it.  I'd be happy with this as it
> stands.

Yup, thanks for sanity checking.

Will queue.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-02 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-01  1:26 [PATCH] gitweb: switch to a modern DOCTYPE Jason Yundt
2022-06-02  0:41 ` brian m. carlson
2022-06-02  6:10   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-02  7:26 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-02 11:43 ` [PATCH v2] gitweb: switch to an XHTML5 DOCTYPE Jason Yundt
2022-06-02 18:50   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-02 19:51     ` Jason Yundt
2022-06-02 21:47     ` brian m. carlson
2022-06-02 22:09       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqmteuiuos.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jason@jasonyundt.email \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).