From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8504FC433F5 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 08:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571C8608FB for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 08:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232299AbhILIYG (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Sep 2021 04:24:06 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61485 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231528AbhILIYF (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Sep 2021 04:24:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A7BF1E62; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 04:22:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=QxkCOgAiI2eLKh6osZ9Cwd7ZcvqqFbZlq2hG0oy6Hj0=; b=BNZh 8KdbGrfuKGTqne9PhQ4Z6s7/3ARa8kRYhn1jO4w8oqn5hp8ynO+NMf5p1JBfV1sO jd0LnALGzL1uBczjP9mxDmqxpGtpHONEGx0O5MFOpuiSmczz0f/cS8Caky4imEKi qNeoKKMOwyHCxQThBQnMjDeVv0LvTu8AhpGB99M= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F44FF1E61; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 04:22:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.172.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5501F1E60; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 04:22:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Git List Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] notes: don't indent empty lines References: <20210830072118.91921-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com> <20210830072118.91921-4-sunshine@sunshineco.com> <878s03c1of.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87wnnn8kba.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 01:22:50 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9EAEE948-13A2-11EC-A201-62A2C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric Sunshine writes: > I'm not a fan of the trailing whitespace either, however, Junio does > have the concern that there may be some tooling somewhere which relies > upon the "indented blank lines" (even if such tooling would not be > robust). Note that such a "concern" is always relative. If the upside were so great, perhaps risking possible breakage may be warranted. FWIW, I am not a big fan of trailing whitespaces that human writers leave in what they write, either. Because the patch text will be full of lines with trailing whitespaces anyway due to a blank lines in the patch context, however, it does not sound so great an upside to tweak how the paragraphs taken from the notes are inserted. Thanks.