From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63237C4338F for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C275613B1 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234610AbhHXTMM (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:12:12 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.50]:54670 "EHLO pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233998AbhHXTML (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:12:11 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 400 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:12:11 EDT Received: from pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0733C767; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:04:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=xiFmLuQoRTZSao3uQWm+FsVIPuY=; b=raCVWc tCRSaO/8uHS8nM2HTGaq5u8IHooENpXaDAgOyyPHEqoWkMl7tUOcSGQVLTT55FOc Wfkw8q1spbZ68ueKHPBEPs23hMgw+CD9aFVnCkepJakaiCuFubwTNSO8YQUC9DJ/ fs7b2wSRqlX5hg+ut8vVrbX4AMs2zEYI3AUog= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kqn0CZFx/GE+Wpys6mLMTHbG6AYOM+yB 9mcxDjtvMV99XBUgIwryFHuPf3jAaEyUuKDUmM7AAkON8GE+IWXrOck/PXFqAn+l HuAjXvmgc7uviRQWrZk8Q3owHGNPwqOXuHrw9UwE9252ETio5q4cPsIG5Z7R4s0t NQqd0OUVbNU= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [10.110.30.21]) by pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F34B3C764; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:04:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.116.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65851143AAC; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:04:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Jiang Xin , Git List , Alexander Shopov , Jordi Mas , Matthias =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=BCster?= , Jimmy Angelakos , Christopher =?utf-8?Q?D=C3=ADaz?= , =?utf-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl?= Avila , Bagas Sanjaya , Alessandro Menti , Gwan-gyeong Mun , Arusekk , Daniel Santos , Dimitriy Ryazantcev , Peter Krefting , Emir SARI , =?utf-8?B?VHLhuqduIE5n4buNYyBRdcOibg==?= , Fangyi Zhou , Yi-Jyun Pan , Jiang Xin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ci: new github-action for git-l10n code review References: <20210822161325.22038-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com> <20210822161325.22038-2-worldhello.net@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:04:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:27:44 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2246C382-050E-11EC-AEB4-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Can this be made into a matter purely local to git-l10n/git-po >> repository and not git/git repository? I am wondering if we can ee if >> the current repository is git-l10n/git-po or its fork and run it only if >> that is true. > > The biggest problem is that there are forks of `git-l10n/git-po` that > accept PRs in their own right. That is what I tried to address by using > just the repository name, without the org/user prefix. Well, it is why I wondered if we can see "if the repository is git-l10n/git-po or its fork". Perhaps I should have written "or (recursively) its fork"? I guess the repository name being git-po may be a usable approximation ;-)