From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629D220756 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 22:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756259AbdAJW7w (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:59:52 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:65475 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751894AbdAJW7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:59:51 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782E85EC0D; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:59:50 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=EnBPOIu8AEdLMQpL4qsVn67hRO0=; b=twp6jP ettvDYIWxHRGJyr/A3uXLSyNntD8K0JxfPc+mf0Z2beD+OoG9AtPCEJvR8x7YvDE x7Gmh4ryHWIzcSWykpmHlEqHLssxu7H7dBuD/YGrFQLmAS06G/ZaIMYF/ixF94hK lLIhflpAg4GCkK3NYw+hPCCg13f+aCP0+bFek= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DnRGXSmJhu/HDn4rH5OlgV3okHlhXWKo 7siYktMNsjv2HXv+7HEYtV09wI7ybv/xNEkEiTdh6lo6n0a751fuBzeDrbfVvNA7 LkvTtHVTC+yQ8LcfV+h6EWb77nagoEYNOBAGETV5jPsYaNlKyLDaTk5uwDvsxFwB nOwCH305BTk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705D55EC0B; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:59:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A70375EC08; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:59:49 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: Jeff King , Lars Schneider , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?66eI64iE7JeY?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asciidoctor: fix user-manual to be built by `asciidoctor` References: <3c160f81a88cf8697f2459bb7f2a3e27fb3e469c.1483373021.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> <20170104080852.bmlmtzxhjx4qt74f@sigill.intra.peff.net> <1D7C66EA-E87A-4154-ACAC-8045D28477D2@gmail.com> <20170105164556.b3bzeqqzx4pvni4z@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170107220834.uge5ksdr66asw27q@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:59:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170107220834.uge5ksdr66asw27q@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> (brian m. carlson's message of "Sat, 7 Jan 2017 22:08:34 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7D365194-D788-11E6-BBB1-FE3F13518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "brian m. carlson" writes: >> [1] I think we've also traditionally considered asciidoc to be the >> definitive toolchain, and people using asciidoctor are free to >> submit patches to make things work correctly in both places. I'm not >> opposed to changing that attitude, as it seems like asciidoctor is >> faster and more actively maintained these days. But I suspect our >> build chain would need some improvements. Last time I tried building >> with AsciiDoctor it involved a lot manual tweaking of Makefile >> variables. It sounds like Dscho is doing it regularly, though. It >> should probably work out of the box (with something like >> USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=Yes) if we expect people to actually rely on it. > > Yes, that would probably be beneficial. I'll see if I can come up with > some patches based on Dscho's work. Thanks.