Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sequencer: release the ODB before spawning git commit
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 11:22:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqo6f81pre.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2198.git.1786388689444.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:04:48 +0000")

"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
>
> As of 4557f1add261 (rebase--helper: add a builtin helper for interactive
> rebases, 2017-02-09), continuing an interactive rebase uses the builtin
> sequencer, which spawns `git commit`.
>
> The child may trigger auto-maintenance, which may need to replace files
> for which the sequencer still holds resources. See
> https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/6315: on Windows, this
> produces unlink retry prompts that cannot succeed while the sequencer
> waits for the child.
>
> Resources such as file handles or memory mappings must be released
> before spawning a command that may run auto-maintenance, as established
> by 28d04e1ec197 (run-command: offer to close the object store before
> running, 2021-09-09).

The sequencer is holding some resources, presumably because it needs
them to continue, and yet auto-maintenance wants to remove them?
Whether or not we face a Windows-specific limitation when removing
them, it is concerning to imagine what would happen if
auto-maintenance were allowed to do so and the sequencer then
resumed its work, only to find that the resources needed for its
operation were gone.

I think what the proposed commit log message lacks after 'must be
released' is 'and after auto-maintenance finishes and we regain
control, we will automatically reacquire these resources in a
refreshed state to proceed'.  Such an explanation would allay the
unease I expressed in the previous paragraph.

Perhaps issues/6315 talks about what exactly are held, but not
spelling it out in the log message is not helping readers.

> Release the sequencer's ODB before spawning `git commit`.

Makes sense.

> The regression
> test uses the legacy-delete trick introduced by 69ed0e35a754 (mingw:
> optionally use legacy (non-POSIX) delete semantics, 2026-05-07) to
> trigger the failure on modern Windows.

> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 57855b0066..83952d96e3 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -1127,6 +1127,7 @@ static int run_git_commit(const char *defmsg,
>  	struct child_process cmd = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
>  
>  	cmd.git_cmd = 1;
> +	cmd.odb_to_close = the_repository->objects;
>  
>  	if (is_rebase_i(opts) &&
>  	    ((opts->committer_date_is_author_date && !opts->ignore_date) ||
> diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> index 58b3bb0c27..8f81c80fd4 100755
> --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> @@ -65,6 +65,24 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' '
>  	test_commit P fileP
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success MINGW 'rebase releases object database before committing' '
> +	test_when_finished "rm -f .git/hooks/post-commit repacked packs" &&
> +	git switch -C repack-rewrite primary &&
> +	git repack -ad &&
> +	write_script .git/hooks/post-commit <<-\EOF &&
> +	git repack -ad &&
> +	>repacked
> +	EOF
> +	(
> +		set_fake_editor &&
> +		FAKE_LINES="reword 1" GIT_TEST_LEGACY_DELETE=1 \
> +			git -c core.commitGraph=false rebase -i HEAD^
> +	) &&
> +	test_path_is_file repacked &&
> +	ls .git/objects/pack/*.pack >packs &&
> +	test_line_count = 1 packs
> +'
> +
>  # "exec" commands are run with the user shell by default, but this may
>  # be non-POSIX. For example, if SHELL=zsh then ">file" doesn't work
>  # to create a file. Unsetting SHELL avoids such non-portable behavior
>
> base-commit: e9019fcafe0040228b8631c30f97ae1adb61bcdc

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-11 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 19:04 [PATCH] sequencer: release the ODB before spawning git commit Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2026-08-11 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqo6f81pre.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox