From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] whatchanged: require --i-still-use-this
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 09:49:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqo6wbufel.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBSLgTlfwSc1u_bH@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Fri, 2 May 2025 11:08:17 +0200")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> I was briefly wondering why this variable wasn't just declared in
> `cmd_whatchanged()`, but that's because parsing is of course done by
> `cmd_log_init_finish()`. Nothing worth thinking about too much.
Yeah, it is between "cfg that is conveniently passed around the code
paths, even though it is not a configuration item" vs "a file-scope
static variable that will live until we decide to remove (or keep)
the command".
>> @@ -656,6 +665,10 @@ int cmd_whatchanged(int argc,
>> opt.def = "HEAD";
>> opt.revarg_opt = REVARG_COMMITTISH;
>> cmd_log_init(argc, argv, prefix, &rev, &opt, &cfg);
>> +
>> + if (!cfg.i_still_use_this)
>> + you_still_use_that("git whatchanged");
>> +
>> if (!rev.diffopt.output_format)
>> rev.diffopt.output_format = DIFF_FORMAT_RAW;
>>
>
> I think it would help potential users of this command quite a bit if we
> explicitly told them what the replacement is. So maybe we can extend
> `you_still_use_that()` to accept an explanation?
I doubt it. The reason why we remove something is not "because a
better alternative exists"; it is "because everybody *HAS* switched
to the better alternative". If we need to educate folks in this
message, the plan to remove that command is still premature.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 21:34 [PATCH 0/2] Nominating "whatchanged" for removal Junio C Hamano
2025-05-01 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] you-still-use-that??: help deprecating commands " Junio C Hamano
2025-05-01 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] whatchanged: require --i-still-use-this Junio C Hamano
2025-05-01 22:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-01 22:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Nominating "whatchanged" for removal Junio C Hamano
2025-05-01 22:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] you-still-use-that??: help deprecating commands " Junio C Hamano
2025-05-01 22:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] whatchanged: require --i-still-use-this Junio C Hamano
2025-05-02 9:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-02 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-05-05 6:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Nominating "whatchanged" for removal Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-02 16:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-03 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] " Junio C Hamano
2025-05-03 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] you-still-use-that??: help deprecating commands " Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 17:35 ` Elijah Newren
2025-05-03 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] doc: prepare for a world without whatchanged Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 17:36 ` Elijah Newren
2025-05-03 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] tests: " Junio C Hamano
2025-05-05 6:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-12 17:36 ` Elijah Newren
2025-05-03 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] whatchanged: require --i-still-use-this Junio C Hamano
2025-05-05 6:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 20:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-03 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] whatchanged: remove when built with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES Junio C Hamano
2025-05-05 6:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-03 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] whatschanged: list it in BreakingChanges document Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 17:36 ` Elijah Newren
2025-05-12 18:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Nominating "whatchanged" for removal Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] you-still-use-that??: help deprecating commands " Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] doc: prepare for a world without whatchanged Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] tests: " Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] whatchanged: require --i-still-use-this Junio C Hamano
2025-05-14 13:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] whatchanged: remove when built with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] whatschanged: list it in BreakingChanges document Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Nominating "whatchanged" for removal Elijah Newren
2025-05-12 22:42 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqo6wbufel.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).