From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FCEC148314 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 02:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.148 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741140391; cv=none; b=VwNWx3KvlYu99E9jwP/lW0/W52K+CAOQZcNHpPIAQuAc8+98veT+xxBXY5IjAKymxQoTVTeHNT5qL4TTV+Lu2P0ekHx9s0XHtQj3BB5NTtCe5wApNJAoYa26g+lN3OQtF4jXIuH2Akvkq0+t0WjRHuyagsV/MyRCiTPd2Wb5hmA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741140391; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qYo1QErre5ibg3Q+BANsqgOJYqLJ4+kj13SPiEm3hNE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kcCaOWyPTK4B1t0xbOo5RsGrNtAt6qOJ5hBpzpe6DfyFov305WLayQHAzvIlRrfQ1ltm+F+xz+rEoVrZKCyAL+s7niI585lSjCljxISt5bgdIeJ/hK9G7wi4Bo2EFlyh4Ki97VnTgnoV9BaYrJPXP4wr2CI8uQrEpcvcjalVXdE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=J/p8efrs; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=r8fmIUHG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.148 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="J/p8efrs"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="r8fmIUHG" Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.phl.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427E9114012E; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 21:06:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:06:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1741140388; x=1741226788; bh=qYo1QErre5 ibg3Q+BANsqgOJYqLJ4+kj13SPiEm3hNE=; b=J/p8efrsBFRxHaXaslrVT1k3Hc 7X4zrNimzlKqUnBI/0HqBt+SapBsdUfHokpvtooSc2sL1ySpdKs19c+j4cdSUCZM XR3FwjuLZ2z4VfkorNJ7PIYNEUTATNqQ67LSvFbjsS79ob4BhKxJ4NETlU9zCu2X ZOnI8PyM+W/Y64/1eQEEJg9h8lxkvLgIrYx4DGwvwqH/UwyLze/8aeD67WxQI47B Eu/LBhkMGEe176RSVyP/r1gXKV2+wb8DFjGzvxDOE4/6X9WSJ39upQc3ahQtMFK4 7Oav6Bcgzi18hmEfgmxNG4fVgy83NdaCvUJgFUY6xcNN2cfxqT85mcQFbunA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1741140388; x=1741226788; bh=qYo1QErre5ibg3Q+BANsqgOJYqLJ4+kj13S PiEm3hNE=; b=r8fmIUHGXVlhYW+7w6osFVf2EbOxof70WUsLhQcwbR3XR0CK0Gw V6IxJJuGnjRIpQZC9WuIwvbE5AFI1BU35LkqtY4ViqDAbol3vUxhpnHfWGI681jQ BwH4zXNt7HU1gfJgVjGFfi530quxYVB3dO7Ob6MgDGaGNN2nz+7LX7q/J54UVNXb xsWSIUrVhxGlzQRUGh92lrP3yUKsTKltQQnkfP2+yDtvOyih2cGCQh6RKzvbtICT epXPIcGLLp/dkewMyqJDItWJbx5MgWApreUklVhTD0R8CC77czUyEZuellqnj2DK HcViw7awyrpGd1HE1Wt62PtF4j2KRdGYyug== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddutdefiedtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttder tdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosg hogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeu feejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeeigeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghr tghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhutggrshhsvg hikhhiohhshhhirhhosehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghr rdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtoh hm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 21:06:27 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lucas Seiki Oshiro Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GSoC][RFC PATCH 0/6] Add --subject-extra-prefix flag to format-patch In-Reply-To: <7350D94E-39DC-4C9B-926A-3FA2A4C76687@gmail.com> (Lucas Seiki Oshiro's message of "Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:19:43 -0300") References: <20250303220029.10716-1-lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com> <7350D94E-39DC-4C9B-926A-3FA2A4C76687@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 18:06:26 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lucas Seiki Oshiro writes: >> Once you stop treating [GSoC] as if it is an independent prefix, >> everything will fall into place naturally without adding anything >> extra. > > So, instead of changing the behavior of format-patch, would it be > better if we changed the documentation to ask these patches to be > sent with `[GSoC PATCH]` or similar instead of `[GSoC][PATCH]`? Yup, I do not know offhand who are managing these descriptions, but having extra moniker in the same [square bracket] as PATCH is a more common practice, and we should follow suit. Thanks.