From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCA4C6FA8E for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229483AbiIZTIo (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:08:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55880 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229573AbiIZTIZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:08:25 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CEF25EDDB for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C0D143A3D; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:08:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=5TbB1qdGRKha LBAhPlb5WKFD2YbWR4ZnBOaOLZuxjXA=; b=ktixA1D2SBiX62gChWTy0LB5ck62 HgM31uULQbsWeFEi6CAd9eE0vP/VmvSraqi/5eEIlqWDv5D86imfpcTgLUqyiAG+ DKsM/s5WCIdznJgVZx6EeXOPBA/Nsjdmv8xlnnSLmPnyxuJRae+F5n49V65wUYzx B9Xx+E7HrqbUynY= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBFC143A3C; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:08:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E90B143A3B; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:08:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] t/Makefile: remove 'test-results' on 'make clean' References: <20220920105407.4700-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <20220920201619.40972-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <220926.86pmfi33cx.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:08:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <220926.86pmfi33cx.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOG?= =?utf-8?B?dmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:08:55 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8E088A84-3DCE-11ED-8A1E-2AEEC5D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > FWIW this wasn't a "while at it", it was critical to making another par= t > of that topic work at all. Perhaps it was critical within the approach of the topic took, and if a different approach was taken or the scope of topic was reduced, you would have avoided it. I would still consider such an unnecessary change an unwated "whilte at it". The moral of the story is that the topic took too big a bite to be done without causing unnecessary mistakes like this.