From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07542021E for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 17:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751036AbcKFRQ4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:16:56 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55238 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750927AbcKFRQ4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:16:56 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04744A70D; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:16:54 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cYWuvz2Lc+5DnntIFPQFQYUvdzA=; b=e4ZvGp FDmDDJElrc7yNVVcOIZ4y9SzZzeN4TOBd0vtwPaJZ4Zu9uLqOjriRzoIzPVDDsTe 5vwyE8mgtjAQEMW3bUFaTHBWLVV2/eZqXIlmXBZfdeOSVvpj1KYCmhUGvF959yF/ KzVS6XTZZ3HT6EYXuNR7b3e6DJ6YL6s6vqRkU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WBBiggcqUXkUr1mgt2BJ5YVQ/SV7uVVe X3qbNqY6rrfAukDhkfIzpaNW5PeVic1IEY7L1luf+wQqyGhh54/lloJp3u4eH8UC AIjs6tu77JISwgp9ZyHaeHGdCnQrPEHgHRMVF4k2TQ0QezNL2CLLFSJ0YExuK0y0 sJCW765X4ek= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E7E4A70C; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:16:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E0A64A70B; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:16:54 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Christian Couder Cc: git , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/19] Documentation/config: add splitIndex.maxPercentChange References: <20161023092648.12086-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20161023092648.12086-13-chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 09:16:53 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Christian Couder's message of "Sat, 5 Nov 2016 01:45:04 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D0733A06-A444-11E6-9EDE-987C12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Christian Couder writes: > I think it is easier for user to be able to just set core.splitIndex > to true to enable split-index. You can have that exact benefit by making core.splitIndex to bool-or-more. If your default is 20%, take 'true' as if the user specified 20% and take 'false' as if the user specified 100% (or is it 0%? I do not care about the details but you get the point).