From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856301F4F8 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754585AbcJTSFX (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:05:23 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58971 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754453AbcJTSFV (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:05:21 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C463A472E9; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:05:19 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=WoZKqySJFsmPq571bX5xFDbvQJE=; b=pwj4LZ CJRje9rZBaz2qh283C8pYOX/Yt0L/Ro0Nxq37xUtO89wl0swQqH82wlgPkXzEDl1 JdDbZixS7dKGyftMY6nseUDCgHC70fRG4xSDi5UVORCdCfaJm0xeiJpQ3mN/JinJ I3RbskkRuMBCV/DhOU9PwWf2VvUMqJ9Zdg0TM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lglvyuRXokVHc+YYfqSX/c2Sq3fnJ2Pm c+jQ5EMEGPm47mDf5EqOKA6wePGv5EF46KJITenPRzbB0rMxUUeEzkxIRr6qtxbP CBl2BJ2ystFcm70+G/5ezIJm0VvDard8y8m9O+w6BzsiK8gK1mFLma43Zn2yhBkV OrcQssDvqZQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2FA472E7; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:05:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D6C0472E6; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:05:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stefan Beller Cc: "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Jeff King Subject: Re: Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for git References: <580893d5a4736_4ed37b53181837@ss1435.mail> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:05:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:58:39 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C2E6F1C8-96EF-11E6-8C5F-3AB77A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller writes: > I do it most of the time, but I did not start managing it. > And I have been pretty lax/liberal about handing out rights to do stuff, > because I did not want to tip on anyone's toes giving to few rights > and thereby annoying them. Good to know that you have been managing it; I was mostly worried about not having anybody managing it (i.e. imagining Coverity nominated/volunteered me as manager with everybody else as viewers) and the new viewer requests get totally ignored by the project as the whole. > I see that some of these emails may be inconvenient to you, I can > change your role to defect viewer/contributor if you prefer. It is not a huge inconvenience to me, because any piece of e-mail that is addressed directly to gitster@ without CC'ing to git@vger and is not a follow-up to any earlier message goes to a separate lowest-priority mailbox that I rarely look at. But if it is easy to recategorize me, please do so. Thanks.