Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] odb/source-packed: flag known-bad objects as corrupt and not missing
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:42:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqpkzeuhuz.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aoV--DSQq8-Krg3M@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 19 Aug 2026 12:01:28 +0200")

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 11:17:47AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
>> > @@ -618,8 +619,11 @@ int fill_midx_entry(struct multi_pack_index *m,
>> >  		return 0;
>> >  
>> >  	if (oidset_size(&p->bad_objects) &&
>> > -	    oidset_contains(&p->bad_objects, oid))
>> > +	    oidset_contains(&p->bad_objects, oid)) {
>> > +		if (bad_pack && !*bad_pack)
>> > +			*bad_pack = p;
>> >  		return 0;
>> > +	}
>> 
>> Hmph, so the idea is that if you have even one bad thing, you are
>> marked as bad, because who knows what other parts of you are broken?
>
> No, not quite. We don't mark the whole pack itself as bad, we only mark
> the objects that's contained in there as bad. The only reason why we
> also bubble up the pack is so that we can provide a better error message
> in a subsequent commit, where we can then tell the user which pack it
> was specifically that contains the bad commit.
>
> That's by itself not visible in this commit yet, but I do mention it as
> part of the commit message.
>
> Patrick

OK.

This is a tangent but the argument heavily relies on the invariant
that a single pack can contain one object at most once.  Once a
corrupt pack that has copies of the same object duplicated in it
comes into the picture, the error message has to say which copy is
bad.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-18 14:19 [PATCH 0/7] odb: handle `OBJECT_INFO_DIE_IF_CORRUPT` generically Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] odb/source: discern missing and corrupt objects Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 18:00   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-19 10:01     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] odb/source-inmemory: signal missing objects via positive return Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 18:05   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-19 10:01     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] odb/source-packed: flag known-bad objects as corrupt and not missing Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 18:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-19 10:01     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 17:42       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-08-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] odb/source-loose: distinguish missing and corrupt objects Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 18:23   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] odb/source-files: signal mark objects via positive return Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 18:58   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-19 10:01     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] odb/source: allow `read_object_info()` to bubble up error messages Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 14:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] odb: handle `OBJECT_INFO_DIE_IF_CORRUPT` generically Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 12:17   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] odb/source-packed: flag known-bad objects as corrupt and not missing Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 12:17   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] odb/source: introduce error status when reading objects Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 12:17   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] odb/source: let callers discern missing and corrupt objects Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 12:17   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] odb/source: allow `read_object_info()` to bubble up error messages Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-19 12:17   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] odb: handle `OBJECT_INFO_DIE_IF_CORRUPT` generically Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqpkzeuhuz.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox