From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C013261B92 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 20:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775852629; cv=none; b=ObVf1+ylCmb2H3Cx+yXevVZ+0lhVvhtOG7Uv/b3dkKSNO7ytkOSrhAR3sqgYiVazIV6UjS9ZhERCJ14K3INcWe7GB4FaGuU53EawDFaPPOlWh5/IjAye0vqDIXlSuGsZVpAJra1SH4C6wV4HmKqd6CQt+KGzsZKtmSG8E75vk64= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775852629; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8dBOBRLV90SSmmvv0ljHkIhX//KhjMxfUdKBhDBIUTM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BohoBJvRiprn+Kt/j04sbtlBpSdVh3nxg/rZNKqYtDKViPSCb5p3IyNgJB63jP9pFXuXVm/ikM+zz51hZC2/dzAt49hGdXLk+mpV8ZU4e5gihJZR5ARF/Dz467PrzuMFZLUdJlTcE87w5twjmz/7Xyj9MdbWfj4RtMgcD0tuAuI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=wIZqobqt; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=i83yUnHj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="wIZqobqt"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="i83yUnHj" Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CC57A011B; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:23:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:23:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1775852626; x=1775939026; bh=F2sZXZLfAg fUj6TOybFpd9vsgei9HiJ99lJJIRYa09E=; b=wIZqobqt8aXx8IXP1JnLm5ruha v5S7gsjoyuO5HaEn1Zbp2X05rt9lWZ1K5g5UEBmOm8onE9chdWir0N7SvVAKU5gU hDPnCnDiK/fxB2EQwQA+KHmDu0Z/QhW8X383ev8G715Q/QIjgzIAXipb8IzA9ER5 +m/hDDilsheu9CifmNq5z2qa2K/puXsPl5OB3lJorOtHZtaLeaXiAMzcBio2U8bV N1bV4OIz2XjEbnwXvKsGCGVp+1USaFBw3kD64AaV8Yi4SNcr+PXDku70fSbawMY5 2e/Swg/wCwh17Io618139Zhz1JDnkn/OrxveEQUe8U88A5GQnP/DSwEpHGTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1775852626; x=1775939026; bh=F2sZXZLfAgfUj6TOybFpd9vsgei9HiJ99lJ JIRYa09E=; b=i83yUnHjN0A4N6TILG0F4vZvWXIWUEqr6/1zyILK7DuN8ALRxak UdJDpmexdD71PeK+jvvGvIokjHjlwPF6YvtFwqnsK70FUQqXP5tpZkvVbTD6/EEy MNIyStlRpEh4CN19VAz/3WoIdiYzYMdgG3k7BBlERrh1PjbhvSWjvMxxkr7M5pvl YYmsm5DYp2DOHfkeU/sfSsVrvPkyqzV2afukKFOLY1US7to+gndB0MP9Kt8/8i+1 mzrLuRUu5pj8xscAVok5vLwLH8CXOgd6Rau186ouq3Dcs6Z2v6BR+gjMSakG2gCy JLI9SDG1TZazt8V0ymLNF3KIWerC5EqjNkw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdeftdefiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucev ucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeiveffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieeg ieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgih htshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeeipdhmohguvgepshhm thhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehsrghnuggrlhhssegtrhhushhthihtohhothhhphgrsh htvgdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehsthholhgvvgesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphht thhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkh hsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopegviigvkhhivghlnhgvfihrvghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhm pdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:23:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: Derrick Stolee , git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt , Ezekiel Newren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable Rust by default In-Reply-To: (brian m. carlson's message of "Fri, 10 Apr 2026 20:04:01 +0000") References: <20260409224434.1861422-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <4efc4133-3726-4b9d-8f06-03c07d48af99@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:23:43 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "brian m. carlson" writes: > On 2026-04-10 at 13:02:13, Derrick Stolee wrote: >> I'm glad you're remembering to help us follow through on this promise. >> >> However, I'm worried that we shouldn't do this change during the rc >> window for 2.54.0. Perhaps we could get a small patch that updates the >> docs to say "we really mean 2.55.0" that lands in the 2.54.0 release, >> and then we merge the requirements for the build in the first batch >> after the release. >> >> This would give us a full release cycle to simmer with the requirement >> instead of slipping it in for the last rc. > > This was actually sent out just before rc0, but Patrick requested some > changes in v1. (I forgot to thread it to the previous version, > unfortunately.) I would like to have it in 2.54 if we can because I > suspect 2.55 will be the last release before 3.0, so that doesn't give > much time for people to update and adjust if there are problems. Huh? I actually was hoping that we would tag 2.95 when everybody feels that 3.0 is on the horizon, and if we are lucky jump directly to 3.0 (while leaving us room to issue 4 extra 2.XX releases if the timeline turns out to be too aggressve after we got such an agreement and 2.95 turns out to be premature). You are saying that we'd skip 2.56 and jump directly to 3.0 at the end of September? I do not recall seeing any discussion, let alone a concensus (rough or not) with such a short timeframe.