From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: SoutrikDas <valusoutrik@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GSOC PATCH] t7003: modernize path existence checks using test helpers
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:11:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqpl6d4wjh.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260209172445.39536-1-valusoutrik@gmail.com> (SoutrikDas's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 2026 22:54:45 +0530")
SoutrikDas <valusoutrik@gmail.com> writes:
> Replace direct uses of 'test -f' and 'test -d' with
> git's helper functions 'test_path_is_file' ,
> 'test_path_is_missing' and 'test_path_is_dir'
>
> Signed-off-by: SoutrikDas <valusoutrik@gmail.com>
> ---
> t/t7003-filter-branch.sh | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh b/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh
> index 5ab4d41ee7..c475769858 100755
> --- a/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh
> +++ b/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh
> @@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ test_expect_success 'rewrite, renaming a specific file' '
>
> test_expect_success 'test that the file was renamed' '
> test D = "$(git show HEAD:doh --)" &&
> - ! test -f D.t &&
> - test -f doh &&
> + test_path_is_missing D.t &&
> + test_path_is_file doh &&
> test D = "$(cat doh)"
> '
> @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ test_expect_success 'rewrite, renaming a specific directory' '
>
> test_expect_success 'test that the directory was renamed' '
> test dir/D = "$(git show HEAD:diroh/D.t --)" &&
> - ! test -d dir &&
> - test -d diroh &&
> - ! test -d diroh/dir &&
> - test -f diroh/D.t &&
> + test_path_is_missing dir &&
> + test_path_is_dir diroh &&
> + test_path_is_missing diroh/dir &&
> + test_path_is_file diroh/D.t &&
> test dir/D = "$(cat diroh/D.t)"
> '
All the checks involving "is-missing" are now stricter than the
original, in that they used to allow "dir" to exist as long as it is
not a directory, etc., but if we audited the code that leads to
these tests can never create a "dir" that is a regular file or
something that is not a directory (which *I* did *NOT*, but
presumably you have already done so?---if so that is worth noting in
the proposed log message), then "test ! -d dir" that is rewritten to
"test_path_is_missing dir" is actually a _better_ test.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-09 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-09 17:24 [GSOC PATCH] t7003: modernize path existence checks using test helpers SoutrikDas
2026-02-09 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-02-10 18:14 ` SoutrikDas
2026-02-10 18:41 ` [GSOC PATCH v2] " SoutrikDas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqpl6d4wjh.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=valusoutrik@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox