From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs/files: deprecate writing symrefs as symbolic links
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:23:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqplapxur0.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014-pks-ref-files-deprecate-symbolic-links-v1-1-4bcd6a4ef6f5@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:17:14 +0200")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> +* Support for `core.preferSymlinkRefs=true` has been deprecated and will be
> + removed in Git 3.0. If set, symbolic refs like "HEAD" would be written as
> + symbolic links instead of as a plain file using the symref format.
The second sentence reads as if we are talking about a newly
introduced feature, but I cannot quite rephrase it to avoid that
impression myself.
> +Note that for now, only the writing side for such symbolic links is deprecated.
> +Reading such symbolic links is still supported for now.
Double "for now". Let's start the above with "Note that only the ...".
> diff --git a/Documentation/config/core.adoc b/Documentation/config/core.adoc
> index 08739bb9d42..e9272bbc0bd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/config/core.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/config/core.adoc
> @@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ core.preferSymlinkRefs::
> and other symbolic reference files, use symbolic links.
> This is sometimes needed to work with old scripts that
> expect HEAD to be a symbolic link.
> ++
> +This configuration is deprecated and will be removed in Git 3.0. Writing
> +symbolic links for symrefs will not be supported anymore.
Or spinning it a bit positively:
Symbolic refs will always be written as textual symrefs.
> -#ifdef NO_SYMLINK_HEAD
> +#if defined(NO_SYMLINK_HEAD) || defined(WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES)
> #define create_ref_symlink(a, b) (-1)
Perhaps we want to say NOT_CONSTANT(-1) here?
> #else
> static int create_ref_symlink(struct ref_lock *lock, const char *target)
> {
> + static int warn_once = 1;
> + char *ref_path;
> int ret = -1;
>
> - char *ref_path = get_locked_file_path(&lock->lk);
> + if (warn_once)
> + warning(_("'core.preferSymlinkRefs=true' is nominated for removal.\n"
> + "hint: The use of symbolic links for symbolic refs is deprecated\n"
> + "hint: and will be removed in Git 3.0. The configuration that\n"
> + "hint: tells Git to use them is thus going away. You can unset\n"
> + "hint: it with:\n"
> + "hint:\n"
> + "hint:\tgit config unset core.preferSymlinkRefs\n"
> + "hint:\n"
> + "hint: Git will then use the symref format instead."));
I've always called them "textual symref" when I needed to
differenciate them from symbolic links. I haven't seen "symref
format", though. Do we have an official terminology?
> + warn_once = 0;
> +
> + ref_path = get_locked_file_path(&lock->lk);
Was there a reason why we want to first warn and then attempt to
lock? We are afraid that we may die before we have a chance to
warn()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 8:17 [PATCH] refs/files: deprecate writing symrefs as symbolic links Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-14 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-10-15 5:59 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-15 14:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-15 6:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-15 16:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-23 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqplapxur0.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).