From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B88C1196D8F for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2024 21:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735250207; cv=none; b=Y2NJhIYuGNDOM7oDu2Nq2JOwl0Mhjku6YmbvY6KstdTOvWvA2GUBkKjXO1e0zn0m7J2L/H3vjfTIWDoKAKvo+rK3mZpMmF1yFpHV71TstrAV/LOKco5qm7ws3PU1eeZAY1oXqt7atUxjhJjj1qOa5D004I+qMR+xHy5myRB8UwY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735250207; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E4ShMTSU5Fpk6FIdyIegwCk7thidHByaOKpVwqoNZoo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Jhp/WCTzDtd6kpYuMiFYAXTT7G0Mm9o03gcO+RMjWgRRqH7WR4v0P1WeuPTxVSkTIPaZcNIqNgqaEcaMi84nDnN10BPVcbMLffhG6jDbGXujZokg+kiueK6qNEnIJ1zRdpakV74LSv2no5erOiRpbIRq48c3b0nfLuukpUsSoiE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=46sg9kdH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=K2wRYO45; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="46sg9kdH"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="K2wRYO45" Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.phl.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DED1140086; Thu, 26 Dec 2024 16:56:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 26 Dec 2024 16:56:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1735250204; x=1735336604; bh=/V7JCCuZ3p KrNMV929cOUsL9LS4kTSYk+21ZwzOQ93o=; b=46sg9kdH5d9zeIG0LJuYkpkUmp jbzRCSGNUCfFn7elKICbPiLx2owELfSE+3V1b/nE1C/a70GHuV6eCZ7iVwXthk/Z K3rg5Z0Nppcp2kN0Arv0UMBe+82nXTZ+nQiqwljHp0XiOjQCfVNTFaKI/O+QZK3A jiDRIbDJvRHt7EpYZWlCEusidwS2VfdS5HFyXMDoVDD6KTi9DFQNUgrohCzj95xD X1py2sUFfPhLBnwbsQ755iKTfFOtD9dRhxLXbomSwc2HF1hpbtTyYyqSoQ53Dy/t Aq8gVXEWT9jVV5PwuYvr1N9IY1wksHE65ml57ZfKV3mryzyRdlK5xINdSoqQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1735250204; x=1735336604; bh=/V7JCCuZ3pKrNMV929cOUsL9LS4kTSYk+21 ZwzOQ93o=; b=K2wRYO45oUTnid9bkWqJUNVptEje4G0ffDY0Se8kp8MHlT/1VEA vIgoA2EpF3BMfoZmq7vAKVYiwSdGbqO1r7SPAJ66onXS2DcXjimtPNqi6QlMTyWj aGIwqEEH1EXHWF/LcZMOf+ebMmPOu8Ck3xjkVw0crmG6MHUG273IWfm2uGLFeQD/ 0gfCDsZjxX3rCXDkfbhhPgcM5xXQr8ItBB5znnTQAdJBaQb+vtxbUf3t2dsGZsvg jG6zlgFTOaqVToQwdfMHsEMUU2qHPPi2TSDPv33+snKF4MxxanAifUx+EDkVhi9n GN/bjX0At6Vhur1X6KpeosQ7AfJsKV5+9Cw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddruddukedgudehgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvve fujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgr nhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepte ehffehffektddufeejtefhteeiudfhgeduveegleehgfeiieeffedugeejffegnecuffho mhgrihhnpehgihhtlhgrsgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgt phhtthhopeelpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegvrhhitgdrphgvih hjihgrnhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhn vghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheptggrlhhvihhnfigrnhesghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpd hrtghpthhtohepjhhonhgrthhhrghnthgrnhhmhiesghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghp thhtoheptghhrhhishgtohholhesthhugihfrghmihhlhidrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhope hkrghrthhhihhkrddukeeksehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepthhoohhnsehi ohhttghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhlthhosghlvghrsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpd hrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 26 Dec 2024 16:56:43 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Ju Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, calvinwan@google.com, jonathantanmy@google.com, chriscool@tuxfamily.org, karthik.188@gmail.com, toon@iotcl.com, jltobler@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] add remote-object-info to batch-command In-Reply-To: <20241223232523.76236-1-eric.peijian@gmail.com> (Eric Ju's message of "Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:25:17 -0400") References: <20240628190503.67389-1-eric.peijian@gmail.com> <20241223232523.76236-1-eric.peijian@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 13:56:41 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Eric Ju writes: > Range-diff against v7: > -: ---------- > 1: c09e21a9d6 cat-file: add declaration of variable i inside its for loop > -: ---------- > 2: ed04a4a7c4 fetch-pack: refactor packet writing > -: ---------- > 3: bc52c4f80c fetch-pack: move fetch initialization > -: ---------- > 4: 4c1b989c41 serve: advertise object-info feature > -: ---------- > 5: dbc95a9ae5 transport: add client support for object-info > -: ---------- > 6: f244ec8a2f cat-file: add remote-object-info to batch-command This is curious. Did you compare the right things? -- 2.47.0 Information Footer: base-commit: 8f8d6eee531b3fa1a8ef14f169b0cb5035f7a772 Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/git/-/merge_requests/168 If the base-commit information is relevant, please do not write it below the "signature" like (i.e. a line that consists only of dash-dash-space near the end of the message), as some e-mail programs consider them irrelevant and omit from quoting. I tried to apply them on top of 8f8d6eee (The seventh batch, 2024-11-01) but the last step [6/6] fails to apply (the first five applied cleanly, and matched what I already had). Could you help to figure out what is going wrong on your end? Thanks.