From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E20FB2AE99 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 15:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722958542; cv=none; b=EmfTHNXOEnr7gRsBUrZ7Gihw4bsEvsN98LySVcAACFzBxVY5edxYSLfpT8ptLWCRrGZQ1wX94vqibg4jfDj18w5bFb0VOTGm78oMcXsqu7NsA+8BSzQNwWxOI+dfgGPSilCJpy/9OMuBtpuh8+K8vUpB75oBVqGtt5gTdig7XLk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722958542; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TFNfDYELTPliyLw8RPFPFbKqTHnMQ2gmSFHq6Xf0AXs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=s51gyHsvqT5m6klVwtw5bIiDLwJRATN4O1FaPg4awrXsekq4lg63N6+mSRUtIZPRXapXGko09zoN9+/LoeMjegADlay1CdzA9ZgCqzKlF14Ilox4yGcXRLYSMkFK4v9Ka+h2EIADdb5g3UhwC26WA67CgyWdYKMfm1zEbsEELtQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=hmymKl5T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="hmymKl5T" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57892E5DF; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 11:35:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TFNfDYELTPliyLw8RPFPFbKqTHnMQ2gmSFHq6X f0AXs=; b=hmymKl5TLWZE2g3bohub5xlQf4WZqKUQ9d5r+03OqT7G9+w2Ad7LEV TkZ4NZQc2MSJ4l7TwLcliGltHbCP5gbL1K4e8FlOZnH+9Z1yBB8W9fLNTRVZJ/Lk 0O8nuLZweFSdJh23TLxUqq0zFqVwZBJcYBNf7hT/J7XEc3uPQEfnU= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDDE2E5DE; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 11:35:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.108.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1007F2E5DD; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 11:35:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: Chandra Pratap , git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder Subject: Re: [GSoC][PATCH v7 0/5] t: port reftable/tree_test.c to the unit testing framework In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:30:31 +0200") References: <20240802121318.4583-1-chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> <20240804141105.4268-1-chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 08:35:32 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 855F33F8-5409-11EF-915F-9B0F950A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Patrick Steinhardt writes: > Oh, yes. I didn't mean to say that I relied on your feedback being > addressed exclusively. I already reviewed v5/v6 of this patch series and > found it to be good, and given that there was only a single change > proposed by you that I'm happy with it translates into me being in favor > of v7, as well. Yes, after sending the message you are responding to, I went back to the original thread and figured that much---the topic is marked for 'next'. Thanks for your help.