From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA4F171672 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712337239; cv=none; b=L+qx0nKr/zdESgNsGTGNc1STLiXth1vZblh1S1ZVYx1WUP7pM+c8hr7PUmjMdow0TGvoc1ywHAGM8FckD3darK+QPCgxBzF5ieLToWok+jm/CypkYfE0VEiTa6D/hnuimXtih6mn4X1+f+lVPuetgdj6UpwJ+jFUf28w8Gprk0Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712337239; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+SZKRsgrGD7h2CQZk749dHHGsgtD+ZijZfWzt4aduck=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iPzo0rKspqbkwmQEeOziQ2Xf/4qEmsmVcVnR2kGZWarEAhhQGRs7PiIt/fYtBXSj07FkJ6Xfrwsia1lXylKQyOM17K5xcNNDNYZXMQZGuQ1ePeCxuxQoW017SuHcQOPV1Kb9xcUpvMqIS2Mv5lGnYqzYvZsys1o2ImVWPa+wk4U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=FIyolGjp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="FIyolGjp" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC1B1D8044; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:13:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+SZKRsgrGD7h2CQZk749dHHGsgtD+ZijZfWzt4 aduck=; b=FIyolGjpVYolzAwCSP1YNFB/Tj3yVeZs0rN+dDcSNSlff5NSSM8cDS RZxrcralLWaHxXQpiMJFOwQSYCWmEDjXP4yJNWnNmV02ZFCCL2mZrnNR9IRVsXIB Wawfp8Gpk6f42/YU3baq8e3ogihp5KaUouB5p298MbXVcXcPBn1KM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671451D8043; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:13:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.229.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5FC01D8040; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:13:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Dragan Simic Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] send-email: make it easy to discern the messages for each patch In-Reply-To: (Dragan Simic's message of "Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:51:55 +0200") References: <0e087ed992def0746f3d437253248904c2126464.1712262791.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <8d47bd687f2ad80bbc1e1c86ae337327@manjaro.org> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 10:13:54 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E24700B4-F36F-11EE-9855-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Dragan Simic writes: > However, making the vertical whitespace a separator also follows > the Git's general approach of not wasting the vertical screen > space whenever possible, so taking the separator route is actually > better, if you agree. Of course. If the topic came from a contributor with a longer track record and used terminator semantics, I would have insisted to consider separator semantics a lot more strongly. With only two commits in this history of any tagged releases, you are getting a bit more lenient treatment ;-)