From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB561DDA6 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707849439; cv=none; b=B1f1xrs8SmKg3l8cgHUe7wQ9txyWpVR0WDhhBFxTcCqgjpluo00Lzt9ZFhewNtoDDQaApKFrlZ6zWtJWgvqijAQ+G48UQFcyucjzLpISeNkBajEhYg9diYN3U9duD9v9deHovGAYGqe8weOyrPnIHliUwmUELmLYOn1uo3SFxzQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707849439; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JcU1bkePJtbjVtrCIHYyxvFOKmDl0xz95SVGZTx16FA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aVxK5mwdaR8cHD67DzEJWQiiBbBOWGtt6KvPryIM4YkTv3Lp/FTdvMoZ4eD4EH1/Gu6ObtrllecyJQpQMctFzB8btyDPIEMBIxN/GgxznawmcgZCS4H0bRiCfiKggAA8L2t+cDVP418mKBscQdCkWfdQkSh85BFIYP2rnKhIT8c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=uwHAUDpr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="uwHAUDpr" Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ADA1C5D8C; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:37:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=JcU1bkePJtbjVtrCIHYyxvFOKmDl0xz95SVGZT x16FA=; b=uwHAUDprRmJRxfjU4YvniMxc8VbeUZlHwmFKZslAIsmpuAoIYV7Dh+ R1ncm9nS329FKMWfc/FFw5ugweUaTb+2jNbYP8rWE7ys+9Ead3FMvK81NsNkoNB4 fSSLqHlKHx3iJ87uxM2rKzFiBqjEK42nZZ7sviyr2FEghDjAb6NKM= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B65B1C5D8B; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:37:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.165.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABA8E1C5D8A; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:37:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] The merge-base logic vs missing commit objects In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2024 08:41:36 +0000") References: Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:37:14 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E8F6E6E4-CA9E-11EE-A329-78DCEB2EC81B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" writes: > I am deeply sorry both about the length of this patch series as well as > having to send it in the -rc phase. You do not have to ;-), but thanks. Also outside the scope of -rc, there were some untied loose ends in the missing tree thing before we can move to a new topic, if I recall correctly. Speaking of -rc, the project would be helped by your expertise a lot if you gave a quick Ack on the make_relative() thing [*]. [Reference] * f6628636 (unit-tests: do show relative file paths on non-Windows, too, 2024-02-11) https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqle7r9enn.fsf_-_@gitster.g/