From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Feature request: Add --mtime option to git archive
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:04:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqpma9m4i1.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+7PcqpYhF5ZuApG@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:50:58 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> A similar option in is to simply start using "0" in the meantime, like:
>
> diff --git a/archive.c b/archive.c
> index 81ff76fce9..48d89785c3 100644
> --- a/archive.c
> +++ b/archive.c
> @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static void parse_treeish_arg(const char **argv,
> archive_time = commit->date;
> } else {
> commit_oid = NULL;
> - archive_time = time(NULL);
> + archive_time = 0;
> }
>
> tree = parse_tree_indirect(&oid);
>
> Nobody will complain about changing the byte-for-byte format, since by definition it
> was already changing once per second (cue somebody complaining that they
> have been using LD_PRELOAD tricks to simulate --mtime).
>
> I do wonder if people would complain (both with the patch above and with
> brian's proposal) that the resulting tarballs extract everything with a
> date in 1970. That's not functionally a problem, but it looks kind of
> weird in "ls -l".
And owned by root:root ;-)
I am sure people would complain. What matters is if these
complaints have merit, and in this case, I doubt it. I especially
like your "it has been already changing once per second" reasoning
for this change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-16 19:41 Feature request: Add --mtime option to git archive Raul E Rangel
2023-02-16 21:05 ` Jeff King
2023-02-16 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-17 0:50 ` Jeff King
2023-02-17 2:04 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-02-17 15:43 ` Raul Rangel
2023-02-17 20:31 ` René Scharfe
2023-02-17 20:25 ` Jeff King
2023-02-18 3:04 ` demerphq
2023-02-18 17:08 ` brian m. carlson
2023-02-18 8:36 ` [PATCH] archive: add --mtime René Scharfe
2023-02-18 17:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-19 10:44 ` René Scharfe
2023-02-21 5:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-22 19:51 ` Jeff King
2023-02-22 23:23 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqpma9m4i1.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=rrangel@chromium.org \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).