From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE50FC433C1 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D9F61936 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230105AbhC0Rnk (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:43:40 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63878 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230092AbhC0RnY (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:43:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9984CA5CE2; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:43:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=t/XeeErNB0lXSKtGah91kb2O1 aQ=; b=IOeCUCrKqar5yhgWuMpbLJ6gq5is2rt4b+/jzie9662YW9Zl2dH2NY49N tBug8rNfoQ+Ao7yDK/T0VdgWwo8GH+TO1pJW8T0ok7DStk4W7Fq8dc4B2coqjFPW R9uk7HhSCoCpJ/JMoDW1eBzmgP+gjU0PEkHQdAtBtyR4Thys1M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=hoIvCsfswiUrew4+10l R/SO5aslNxbplysCzDgzVumHKq5X4g07GUMpYFHFSRh8ogwWzW9r043AEx9FKry1 bRDqB83S072+twFuptlMFXAee2JuuNKe/8cXFsfzzFu/ljTQbpZZSv++C7UGL6cu pjuTO8B8aY3WCxNrAP5COyAI= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DE4A5CE1; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:43:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A60CA5CE0; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:43:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Jeff King , SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , Eric Wong Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Makefile/coccicheck: fix bugs and speed it up References: <20210306192525.15197-1-avarab@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 10:43:22 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: ED3617DE-8F23-11EB-9AF5-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > A v4 (I'm counting the 5/4 patch I sent to v2 as a v3) which produces > the exact same end result as that v2 + 5/4 patch, but with a rewritten > commit message/squash as requested by Junio. > > =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason (4): > Makefile/coccicheck: add comment heading for all SPATCH flags > Makefile/coccicheck: speed up and fix bug with duplicate hunks > Makefile/coccicheck: allow for setting xargs concurrency > Makefile/coccicheck: set SPATCH_BATCH_SIZE to 8 > > Makefile | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) It seems that after some back and forth, nobody is talking about this series anymore since Wednesday 24th. Am I correct to assume that we are now all waiting for a cleaned-up new iteration to get us closer to the finalized version? Thanks.