From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB33FC4363A for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE702075E for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="G4Jg4VN/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726126AbgJ2TKH (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:10:07 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:61607 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726120AbgJ2TKG (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:10:06 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A47310280A; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:10:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=omVFIGrr1QTOmNHmrOtCcU1H09Q=; b=G4Jg4V N/K9zJH8eG6mM8M+Px7dCtT2jg1lwmDhWi18ypA6hOAxztgh8C5sjDtZG4ZMFplE XTBDF4qzEMvFL07iYKSdK+LVGYRQII1fSZ3g0julACDXOpo+8PUUVUKbkOwe0t+3 GI4xRjEBv+FpEH/7M5aSN8U24QVomDJf6WfT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UtNd53+4SGgm5o9upj2KcdDFHN/zFWoL 9E2Y0PeqkJPBpOZ6alOaxdxFbO5InRmuVb4IeU7ic5GymtsNHO7MZdh1zRVOhig0 ou471DQ/O5KZfxjJbHzef6uXlYnweLLAhpNxUK+eExlmmKXIzdMbKUJJxtF6HaRZ E94Y7NG6D2w= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83155102809; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:10:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E5BD102805; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:10:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Felipe Contreras Cc: =?utf-8?B?0JvRkdGI0LAg0J7Qs9C+0L3RjNC60L7Qsg==?= , Stefan Haller , Alexey via GitGitGadget , Git Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix zsh installation instructions References: Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:09:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:50:25 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5826C7FC-1A1A-11EB-A4F4-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: >> I would rather leave it out. > > Makes sense. Instead of adjusting my rerere database for that, > ejecting lo/zsh-completion topic would be easier---what the other > half of that patch does is already in your 29-patch series. Actually, I already have an entry in my rerere database to resolve the merge of these topics to drop the "autoload" suggestion, so I won't have to do anything other than just queuing the v3 of your 29-patch series.