From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] upload-pack: do not lazy-fetch "have" objects
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:55:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqpn8wie21.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715223112.2018556-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (Jonathan Tan's message of "Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:31:12 -0700")
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
> When upload-pack receives a request containing "have" hashes, it (among
> other things) checks if the served repository has the corresponding
> objects. However, it does not do so with the
> OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT flag, so if serving a partial clone, a
> lazy fetch will be triggered first.
OK.
Fixing issues hit by real users reactively is a necessary and good
thing, but this is not the first time we patch callers of
has_object_file() for this kind of "we are merely trying to
determine the boundary of what we have, so that we know what we need
to add to this repository" queries, I am afraid.
Perhaps it is a good idea to sweep all the hits from "git grep -e
has_object_file \*.c" and audit the codebase to see if there are
other problematic ones?
For example, list-objects.c::process_blob() tries to if the object
exists when --exclude-promisor-objects is in effect so that it can
return early if the object is missing and it is a promisor object.
I would imagine that we would not want to lazy-fetch the object in
this case.
Thanks. Will queue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 22:31 [PATCH] upload-pack: do not lazy-fetch "have" objects Jonathan Tan
2020-07-15 22:55 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-07-16 10:41 ` Jeff King
2020-07-16 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-16 18:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Tan
2020-07-20 17:42 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqpn8wie21.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).