From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ABD20281 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 02:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751619AbdJaCoe (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:44:34 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:60560 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751399AbdJaCod (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:44:33 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A28CA90DD; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:44:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Eso7Dc3yAsj4QjbsoVOSBTZEQws=; b=akzCrG ODD+197EkuON/+bREZiaREgEhxKZfhAS4eOaR9cX7MGbtG/3a0NlB9B5MsMW48iO vZrTZpLAwS6ZkqO27ecpylpZyuU6Eqv/TpgAvxYivbuONZzwCyeSEXHNE4JLbXAu rdNI/rstOjZq3rGFw5OzoTGPI7tEcwEUnle3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=x3/qDmOOGbpFxgBIxsFPtVnvIu28F83D k7FYAQAJoBjoVe5h3S4lRTpz6HZB1W50ncHar27don6O8G39gIihy2Y4PZxCcjjD qXliDl2EdZJKmVKmEykHc8D4BXtCpCWlNAJmpZVAXhFzP+RHQJA1levE1DGhvIAu lhr4cp8GLHM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3134BA90DB; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:44:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A574A90D9; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:44:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stefan Beller Cc: git , Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Nieder , Lars Schneider , Jeff King , Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re* Consequences of CRLF in index? References: <20171027170745.2125-1-sbeller@google.com> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:44:31 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:20:59 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6CB5CCC0-BDE5-11E7-8C52-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller writes: > (I note this as you regard your patches as a lunch time hack > in the cooking email; I am serious about these patches though.) We do not want to touch borrowed code unnecessarily. Are these lines and bits hampering further progress we are actively trying to make right now?