From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F89320989 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752225AbcJJWsi (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:48:38 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50449 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751743AbcJJWsh (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:48:37 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C22460AD; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:48:36 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=J0/C66BWR+J2+JwPjvRtq6JdR58=; b=BMQUwW X+15u/H+7lMseJnL20cBuMiSEk5fbVp80rjOjZoJ1X/B6Xn/K7v3StolVZFn36xy chFaLcLJYsHcbBP/BaytSkJN8HtkokbBpl2rzZUu3nAo+lMyLJNcmslKiKk6aa7i 4xBY1K2l84VK/WTenglqDJj7OUOIKBnQcJkmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rZT5cul6/NXc8Wa53pH8YIuVlx/g+zAX 77Het+TiuqxMd5A5Ql9k13HK/EDQsY1BECthY6GDLFFC7Ovzlcei2xIGuPNW1o5w KXfo9TJIidWAjRnsno3uUP9vh+PtCnil4i3qkCg+tlumeNxmMO+M1B4sqAvrG+PR HTbMIdQtwEA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0559A460AC; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:48:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D7B1460AA; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:48:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Heiko Voigt Cc: Jeff King , Stefan Beller , git@vger.kernel.org, Jens.Lehmann@web.de, Fredrik Gustafsson , Leandro Lucarella Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] serialize collection of refs that contain submodule changes References: <81bdbf6a1295c17c1b9233c91da6e5eb4583785e.1475851621.git.hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:48:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <81bdbf6a1295c17c1b9233c91da6e5eb4583785e.1475851621.git.hvoigt@hvoigt.net> (Heiko Voigt's message of "Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:06:35 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AD1966A2-8F3B-11E6-BD04-F99D12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Heiko Voigt writes: > +static int append_hash_to_argv(const unsigned char sha1[20], void *data) > +{ > + struct argv_array *argv = (struct argv_array *) data; > + argv_array_push(argv, sha1_to_hex(sha1)); > + return 0; > +} Do we have struct object_id readily available in the caller? ... goes and looks ... No, this is part of sha1_array API, so this callback is perfectly fine.