From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Tian Yuchen <a3205153416@gmail.com>
Cc: Ayush Jha <kumarayushjha123@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>,
Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>,
Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>,
Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC][GSoC][PATCH] attr: use local repository state in read_attr
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:37:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqqzqsw4og.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96329bc6-0490-454b-a21b-babb85c98bc9@gmail.com> (Tian Yuchen's message of "Sun, 8 Feb 2026 12:42:07 +0800")
Tian Yuchen <a3205153416@gmail.com> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> >The codepath read_attr() is in is usually not that hot but it is not
> >cheap.
>
> I'm a bit curious—under what circumstances would calling this method
> result in significant performance regression?
Significant? I dunno.
And quite honestly, I do not care about significance very much in a
case like this. Doing things that do not make sense, like checking
the same configuration variable again and again when you _know_ that
you never switched to a different repository since you last checked,
is simply wrong. It burdens the readers with unnecessary cognitive
load by making them wonder why you do such a nonsensical thing.
The read_attr() is called during an attr stack construction, which
traverses the directory hierarchy of a single repositry's working
tree (we do not traverse across submodule boundaries), and the same
istate (i.e., index contents) structure is passed around throughout
the callchain. The repository instance at istate->repo may be a
good place to store "am I bare?" bit that is computed just once and
reused whenever we need to know, like in the funcion under
discussion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-10 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-07 11:40 [PATCH] [RFC][GSoC][PATCH] attr: use local repository state in read_attr Ayush Jha
2026-02-07 19:12 ` Tian Yuchen
2026-02-07 21:02 ` Lucas Seiki Oshiro
2026-02-07 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-08 4:42 ` Tian Yuchen
2026-02-10 14:05 ` Ayush Jha
2026-02-14 0:04 ` Lucas Seiki Oshiro
2026-02-14 6:47 ` Ayush Jha
2026-02-10 23:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-02-11 16:43 ` Tian Yuchen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqqzqsw4og.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=a3205153416@gmail.com \
--cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=kumarayushjha123@gmail.com \
--cc=lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com \
--cc=siddharthasthana31@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox