public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Tian Yuchen <a3205153416@gmail.com>
Cc: Ayush Jha <kumarayushjha123@gmail.com>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org,
	 Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	 Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
	 Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>,
	 Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>,
	 Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>,
	 Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC][GSoC][PATCH] attr: use local repository state in read_attr
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:37:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqqzqsw4og.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96329bc6-0490-454b-a21b-babb85c98bc9@gmail.com> (Tian Yuchen's message of "Sun, 8 Feb 2026 12:42:07 +0800")

Tian Yuchen <a3205153416@gmail.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>  >The codepath read_attr() is in is usually not that hot but it is not
>  >cheap.
>
> I'm a bit curious—under what circumstances would calling this method 
> result in significant performance regression?

Significant?  I dunno.

And quite honestly, I do not care about significance very much in a
case like this.  Doing things that do not make sense, like checking
the same configuration variable again and again when you _know_ that
you never switched to a different repository since you last checked,
is simply wrong.  It burdens the readers with unnecessary cognitive
load by making them wonder why you do such a nonsensical thing.

The read_attr() is called during an attr stack construction, which
traverses the directory hierarchy of a single repositry's working
tree (we do not traverse across submodule boundaries), and the same
istate (i.e., index contents) structure is passed around throughout
the callchain.  The repository instance at istate->repo may be a
good place to store "am I bare?" bit that is computed just once and
reused whenever we need to know, like in the funcion under
discussion.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-10 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-07 11:40 [PATCH] [RFC][GSoC][PATCH] attr: use local repository state in read_attr Ayush Jha
2026-02-07 19:12 ` Tian Yuchen
2026-02-07 21:02 ` Lucas Seiki Oshiro
2026-02-07 21:41   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-08  4:42 ` Tian Yuchen
2026-02-10 14:05   ` Ayush Jha
2026-02-14  0:04     ` Lucas Seiki Oshiro
2026-02-14  6:47       ` Ayush Jha
2026-02-10 23:37   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-02-11 16:43     ` Tian Yuchen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqqzqsw4og.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=a3205153416@gmail.com \
    --cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
    --cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    --cc=kumarayushjha123@gmail.com \
    --cc=lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=siddharthasthana31@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox