From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B82723098F for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 04:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732250093; cv=none; b=OMilWvtOENd2dmFoMnIamXQAEcNO5bQjGIn6gqC+p/uKBHWZUCBd8hN8YnH5HOnGmywe4mQYfS1tTs5/nJwr7uLtF6P+97GYVf5SrhCN7qfIbygm5MgG+pRoIUTGbBF4O1FkF4lYEQ8jOo0CBqtF+XyRrkZ8HSazS8YaSh9vkas= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732250093; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TKCRJmQBYo8BhbAl3opklU4KLEatf9xb6LbyX+n6rDI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XZWdEdFZ/o90yg28g8VQNvlear3dfsNHaHDoJYS+snffH7w48R4Gwh/NY9/MyUh65sPZBXNLQ8f2l6RJrM07lC83odHP0hKrxmOEWvESWCmo90cfVgnOCOXHihZHxBZAucXsHQ+ASod0e9fo6Io3JtcFP3lMaSJ1Z8OyftZSiQ4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=gng2C8KE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="gng2C8KE" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A17011400E3; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 23:34:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Nov 2024 23:34:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1732250090; x=1732336490; bh=TKCRJmQBYo8BhbAl3opklU4KLEatf9xb6Lb yX+n6rDI=; b=gng2C8KEIlN7rZpV7Le6PnS5BUv/wqyHtP58Vl6xXr4BZIsAzEu st2rSZd/k7p7h6a4z+UPmP82A0ThZ6QmR+vLX1xD2gkQeC+c+rNXEiiK/5DXvA1T ZQ4JluotH7FHNI5d0qNm+qE7IGjXdI7qCBzkqHMc91UVPRteSVY1tGNP84YrZOCc cIuaeDxrlOFlnN9BZRp4BGqpuV8/wj8UL3684CcnMu3ZS/My2CXFiJd0NuqkGyhV G+Q9EaON2JN50pNnLitL/7W+QHagmNl/6Ubs17z5Vkz13YFftDISsDhIYxMkX20t 4JIxgQk8A0LkIXY3DG6Q+sGLr2BWupV2b7w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrfeejgdejvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvvefujg hffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhho uceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeevte etjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeeigeeinecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesph hosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhr tghpthhtohepmhgvsehtthgrhihlohhrrhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvgh gvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidr tghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 23:34:49 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2024, #07; Wed, 20) In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:40:27 -0500") References: Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:34:48 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Taylor Blau writes: > One topic I did not see is [1], which appeared not to be picked up in > this or the last cycle. That topic has been reviewed and should be in > good shape. I think the thread died down after agreeing on some > potentially interesting future improvements we could make, but I don't > think there were any outstanding issues with the current patches. I didn't get the impression that there was a general concensus that it was a good implementation, but perhaps I am misremembering things. These two patches touch only the test helpers, but I am wondering if it becomes easier to implement on top of your later changes that allows the production side to also access the unsafe variant of the algorithm? Thanks.