Re: Reftable progress

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:03 AM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> wrote:
>> The bottom 2 commits should be OK to merge as is into next.
>> ("checkout: add '\n' to reflog message", "lib-t6000.sh: write tag
>> using git-update-ref")
>
> The patch t3432: use git-reflog to inspect the reflog for HEAD can
> also be merged as is.

Yeah, carving test updates in the early parts out of the series and
have them in 'next' and then in 'master' may make sense.  Good idea.

>> The major open question is how to handle per-worktree refs.  My idea
>> is that, on creation, the reftable backend can figure out if it is
>> running in a worktree or in the main repository. If it is running in
>> worktree X, we could read/write pseudorefs as ~X/PSEUDO_REF.
>
> I figured out a better way to do this. See the series that I am  posting today.

It seems that patches started trickling in but perhaps missing
pieces are mailspools somewhere and would arrive later?  I'll check
the list archive tomorrow to see if all 20 patches have arrived.

Thanks.