From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1D9C433DF for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799FF2070A for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="giArKtdh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726246AbgEOSGb (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2020 14:06:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:63982 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726023AbgEOSGa (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2020 14:06:30 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F70ED6040; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:06:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mgSJ4XWpFfGBTgKt2FsehrfBNoY=; b=giArKt dhZyLTTvdoIjbfESlBwRpHdXRrUOFy8Rb9l15u3ch1+d/1Rk4fYqZ3HCW0hMPg/r iL4qu7yAUHLE6Nkcru7RB3FXxJM37NOcoQbpggLRnwJE9+g0JmQMD/2QHh7zX+c6 tCXuyJ68wO9FtspIMlJG2h+7if0yA/+tJUZlY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UxrbW2Jo1wl5L17+8+QyEBy895s5BVsj lUukz7bS98ns5oXiESHe5vkJNa4wdEVf1NU4W39t2Bl1Zq0lsKdm0nyftPuOPCa/ 4JbK0pSahZobSxQY+rlxvLCgohH1Xlyoucb+kvYitHk3ehy2cyy8fPDGp2dvCjmD z1lXpqj9eiQ= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27981D603F; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:06:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ECCFD602D; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:06:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren Cc: Git Mailing List Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2020, #05; Thu, 14) References: Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:06:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren's message of "Fri, 15 May 2020 08:25:41 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CBCE5D68-96D6-11EA-917D-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Elijah Newren writes: > This summary feels misleading; it's not simple rename + content merge, > it's double rename + content merge. Perhaps: > > When a binary file gets modified and renamed on both sides of history > to different locations, both files would be written to the working > tree but both would have the contents from "ours". This has been > corrected so that the path from each side gets their original content. Thanks.