From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA9D20954 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752852AbdLDVkQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:40:16 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57679 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752538AbdLDVkN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:40:13 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DBCAF2ED; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:40:13 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Q/Al9peHScYdEi+ebkhDSnuyeJo=; b=RWbsEL IXWxLT5MrGlEnrfmodBKlf15FocRB0KOBhUbs2gXU+qdMEet233O3dL5+HlNSqg4 qNFtJJihVkQGvwveNWOE/oJMFi22+VN7TCkuDKiA3dLaQMt5DoeXZR1NkSf/19vd qkT2NrTWgZLEquCb1Wggq/Yq9HeAb+TRsezYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lDoLbG/wgiHOhuVnMpE/6ZTR4I8PIKux lRYcBu4yLWLWAvAaYN31JJZP46/6/CUGzXFPunZmiqOFZDbxZfvXvlce1g8Vz2T/ lQS+bQQh6cXDuzZx7Mr/52cbQ9s3JWmeaF7jqaiREl2pmxsquP03qAAp0uCKwRSS 94O0wUhzWUg= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F245EAF2EC; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:40:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FF8DAF2EB; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:40:12 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Lars Schneider , Lars Schneider , Git List , Stefan Beller , Eric Sunshine , kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] launch_editor(): indicate that Git waits for user input References: <20171129143752.60553-1-lars.schneider@autodesk.com> <20171129143752.60553-3-lars.schneider@autodesk.com> <20171130205137.GC3313@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20171204173223.GF13332@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:40:11 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20171204173223.GF13332@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:32:23 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B538565E-D93B-11E7-BE9A-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Lars Schneider wrote: > >> I am on the fence here. I like consistency but I don't want to >> bother Git users. >> >> @Peff: Do you lean into either direction? Could you imagine that >> novice/regular users are bothered? (I don't expect experts to be >> bothered too much as they would likely be able to find and set >> the advice config). > > I also am on the fence, and am OK with any of the options discussed. > > But now I've said my reservations on the list, so I can say "I told you > so" if people complain (and naturally refuse to admit my objections if > people love it). :) Heh. I am even OK with not doing anything for that matter ;-)