From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C721F437 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751647AbdA0Vqv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:46:51 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57647 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbdA0Vqt (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:46:49 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933D863BB4; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:40:32 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=LGsg5iBn7V+BrLFOpNsFkwjwWZM=; b=fO0GwH phmjNHItFLifNbiHBqOxovKpr89zUQEFRSHQmMMNXmwOPOOC2l319pxpn6eMTkkN hwtYoi0ExfjLEX1GeiwgxCoPM/ti/kdMM9IwIMH+NT/kPPFfHffQhxg4+qsKH+rA zxOw/DRo774Y/BxZ35A7w6svQr7p3RYgP6foY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=TyUFRbPzp29GOG1t2RJ++/Lk34YzxaNf PkXXMN4DaFqkt3lcJ4p6aENU1imvkUnyaxTOFo9cNV67Vm+XsJ43uqz3OMezx9qV 76qfg0dsQ3U97e9X0UUhR8IOIBYNHIDKhopZLvjNBmS6N/P6u0i90eTeuk6crU62 uaoxTK8/pOE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1A563BB3; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:40:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C764963BB2; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:40:31 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Cornelius Weig Cc: "git\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify distinction between sign-off and pgp-signing References: <20170127200136.29949-1-cornelius.weig@tngtech.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:40:30 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Cornelius Weig's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:04:21 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3A4A02A0-E4D9-11E6-925B-A7617B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Cornelius Weig writes: > Sorry, I forgot to mark this patch as follow-up to message > I appreciate that you are very considerate, but in practice, if you do not have too many topics in flight and your response time is less than 48 hours, we can tell which new message is about which older discussion thread. Don't worry about it too much. Thanks.