From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Why does "git log -G" works with "regexp-ignore-case" but not with other regexp-related options? Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:59:39 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1090496912.6338.1429264855691.JavaMail.open-xchange@ox1app> <55311831.6010004@drmicha.warpmail.net> <5534BD87.8020709@drmicha.warpmail.net> <55360D3D.3010201@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Linus Torvalds , Tim Friske , git To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 21 19:00:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YkbXN-0004Di-Tr for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:00:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933975AbbDUQ7y (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:59:54 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:57394 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933725AbbDUQ7r (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:59:47 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D54D49D88; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:59:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/IMMFktOTIVv+DFyyANA0InO0o0=; b=CjOxEF AvizIoPSAkbJFByX9d1uL31pa8qmTABZCkcXCS6mZMi4xgZfdzqIeWkm6aAntIEJ AQ9G0Fnsz2AZaBeHToJ3Gwok3Jz3WoKlB/wF6MxcPbPf6kF0rdkwWgD3xJ8Mbt/n OqVwsJkoU/S+vkNztX6C9eic/Y4Oa9bxKvSs8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YKJrbmRvKVVMPSxIsLCdxmblFB9RmP11 yl+CZ9D52cz7Ko4iWqJ4v9mN37AM8sPLP/jJ69548fTcflZ1HzYITobUCkEYD7rl mKO+cqxsuaJ9pz328F4DEGiqMtnaXevNUZfW1WowVT3bCmVN6Gwp/CAdXOGn3lCl FJzBJC9B8w0= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EF149D87; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFEAE49D86; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:59:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <55360D3D.3010201@drmicha.warpmail.net> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:41:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CD05FDB4-E847-11E4-8A12-83E09F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber writes: > We have engine-switching options and engine-modification options. The > latter are certainly good in the expression itself. Maybe even the > former, though I don't know how to switch away from fixed-strings in > that way... I do not think mixing matching engines in a single request makes much sense. As the internal machinery is not even prepared to do that, even though it is prepared to apply engine-modifications ones to each grep term AFAIK, let's not go there.