From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA227330659 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771964597; cv=none; b=SK4fOmCZbp2d6k8oEFcnJ7onATEWOtTKEsDnyqGvOmVzJGLvpTFoqGL/drJipg54jrbU40xvBUu/RWIbl7qHZ02htHsfI1r9C+zgDvqsTVI+AqCnR4MbUC8goSqpqzG0oYTzuPDALjTz09rlaX3Sy6ESuI4Yyo7wUfTILNJPmGw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771964597; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vOJHkZul+vEzTRgau3tP+2EtFNnAtoMVYskNvflRXOk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PK0+Gd8AjAT1WFgqEqDMFs4RXMW4XeTr05JmXYN0jqVt0+LKiL2KlHf9FQUpqQqyXgAYGodnoi6QpU7+ZUT3ZxFNIOJWWJJFCnPPf4hp+dff1tsTNksS9px5t+nIlstdNz3wPgZkm37scavJWVGDoLjOEyPqCUYTwtwHvVFJTYI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=LCc3ZQ9s; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Grz7SVx+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="LCc3ZQ9s"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Grz7SVx+" Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9317A018A; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:23:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:23:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1771964594; x=1772050994; bh=huz2sJGllJ swVtbbtDXDCuXi9X2nQbg0rqWN59Wex5Q=; b=LCc3ZQ9syjLeUmw7P3QrO1cHL6 Q+kxVmIIqBaWatPSSZ1P2JseJJWyZ+MvYt5jh0Eb9SU/dT1abT/DCdObw7B/FVod 5NFoqG+zKZyUxSmRsngMm6MoICqq68MtDh1twRX22EwppVCYk07BUOLVP/dVwikT AGN9TjsLeyB0ZY2JTiHf3DBTddXjTcXd16+LrLknVqB6+gX9g0tVEF/aiHxBJgjE V+ga+FWbbA8SxsW49c81zkPC7kdY99uxSJTcCvKx7IdXaFYKqzbp8bxw4Ykd4VXw NBRnIgw6MSNFCJlVBB7G5Q6gnqKlgfcEYYxMK6CXysMK1F8ovQ4fMwBatEgA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1771964594; x=1772050994; bh=huz2sJGllJswVtbbtDXDCuXi9X2nQbg0rqW N59Wex5Q=; b=Grz7SVx+3CV1lyQz8wVC0MucAzXRMm6qxiZdECVGldG+QPVo/Ru /ZpSAV/Mkiuc94refWsThoOF4m4KTWU6NGkD0GSQLJTAXOde3H4hDrWwRI45D9sh 1D/Hine85a4zP+tNet3uz25b0KAI9PgFw+exNpQNd0wF3MXnUrytQEnKWXkL7t3H 45uzpHgichH0OdOyidZ+vEcKHBHXgq990qn5QpH6k9OD+xoFzPbhc1CN9VSvnsWE jlJv6qtgKxN/vHmzgUG+x0T4Po8HTbkfAT3LSoCfWj0oHSu3Rax2uAPzJrUUXSDz RvvTXq4AAqHJ57bX7K1ExzD9Fh7a6rkGs6w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvgeduudefucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtofdttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepieekueefhfetvdfftdegfeekhfffgefgfeeivddugeffgfffffevvedvieel ffdunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepjedpmhhouggvpehs mhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhrihhsthhofhhfvghrhhgruhhgshgsrghkkhesfh grshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhonhgrthgrnhesjhhonhhtvghsrdhp rghgvgdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpth htohepphgvfhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopegsvghnkhhnohgslhgvsehg mhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhgurghlshestghruhhsthihthhoohhthh hprghsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:23:13 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" Cc: "Jonatan Holmgren" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Jeff King" , "D . Ben Knoble" , "brian m. carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc: fix list continuation in alias subsection example In-Reply-To: <1178ac42-0d8a-430a-9ca2-a170e4e6932e@app.fastmail.com> (Kristoffer Haugsbakk's message of "Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:14:09 +0100") References: <3124b359-2929-4f3f-9ac6-793277fe422b@jontes.page> <20260224171245.458377-1-jonatan@jontes.page> <20260224171245.458377-2-jonatan@jontes.page> <1178ac42-0d8a-430a-9ca2-a170e4e6932e@app.fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:23:12 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" writes: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026, at 20:11, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Jonatan Holmgren writes: >> >>> The example showing the equivalence between alias.last and >>> alias.last.command was missing the list continuation marks (+ >>> between the shell session block and the following prose, leaving >>> the paragraph detached from the list item in the rendered output. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jonatan Holmgren >>> --- >>> Documentation/config/alias.adoc | 7 ++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> This seems to address the same issue as 0ed2275f (doc: config: fix >> list continuation in alias section, 2026-02-23). Should we treat >> this one as a replacement of that one? > > Yeah I think so. Thanks. Will discard 0ed2275f then.