From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Yee Cheng Chin <ychin.git@gmail.com>
Cc: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
Yee Cheng Chin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xdiff: re-diff shifted change groups when using histogram algorithm
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 12:58:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsebo9lv6.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHTeOx8SOZmqvi0pkcheSjFpbEALmOwaUiX0tKLmNP7fqvjMXA@mail.gmail.com> (Yee Cheng Chin's message of "Thu, 29 Jan 2026 08:53:04 -0800")
Yee Cheng Chin <ychin.git@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for the review and sorry for being a little late in replying.
> Aggregating all my inline replies in one email if that's ok.
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 12:51 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> So the idea is to remember the original values in g and go (the
>> location of the group in the file and the other file) and if
>> shifting up and down changed any one of the four ends from the
>> original locations, we always take the fall-back route (if we are
>> doing histogram)?
>>
>> By the way, this appears after the if/else if/ cascade that has:
>>
>> if (g.end == earliest_end) {
>> ... do nothing case (case #1)
>> } else if (end_matching_other != -1) {
>> ... do the slide-up thing (case #2)
>> } else if (flags & XDF_INDENT_HEIRISTIC) {
>> ... do the indent heuristic thing (case #3)
>> }
>>
>> Am I reading the code correctly that, even though this new block
>> appears as if it is a post-clean-up phase that is independent from
>> which one of the three choices are taken in the previous if/elseif
>> cascade, it only is relevant to the second case? I am wondering if
>> it would make it easier to follow if the new code were made into a
>> small helper function that is called from the (case #2) arm of the
>> existing if/else if cascade.
>
> That's correct. This condition happens only in the 2nd case. The
> problematic scenario here only happens when the opposite side is
> non-empty. If the opposite is empty (case #3, where we run the indent
> heuristic algorithm), there's simply no need to re-diff anything
> because diff'ing against an empty hunk is pointless.
OK. In the version posted, it appeard that it is possible, after
not doing the slide-up thing but using indent heuristic thing, to
fall into this compensation codepath because the new code was placed
after the above if-else-if cascade as if it is an independent
clean-up phase. Encapsulating that new code in a helper function
and calling it at the end of "do the slide-up thing" block will make
the intent clearer.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-06 20:51 [PATCH] xdiff: re-diff shifted change groups when using histogram algorithm Yee Cheng Chin via GitGitGadget
2026-01-21 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-24 10:54 ` Phillip Wood
2026-01-25 17:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-26 9:37 ` Phillip Wood
2026-01-26 17:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-29 16:53 ` Yee Cheng Chin
2026-01-29 20:58 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-01-30 1:58 ` Yee Cheng Chin
2026-01-30 5:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-30 16:06 ` Phillip Wood
2026-02-20 23:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-21 9:56 ` Yee Cheng Chin
2026-03-02 14:54 ` [PATCH v2] " Yee Cheng Chin via GitGitGadget
2026-03-13 7:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-13 10:23 ` Phillip Wood
2026-03-19 23:30 ` Yee Cheng Chin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqsebo9lv6.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=ychin.git@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox