git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	 Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci(dockerized): do show the result of failing tests again
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 11:27:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsee1rjyx.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8054499-aacc-f697-c117-116729432c3a@gmx.de> (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2025 18:40:39 +0100 (CET)")

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi Elijah,
>
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2025, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 9:17 AM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
>> <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
>> >
>> > The quality of tests/test suites does not show as much when there are no
>> > breakages as in the amount of time required after bugs trigger test
>> > failures before the bugs can be identified, analyzed and resolved.
>> 
>> I found this paragraph hard to parse.  After re-reading a couple
>> times, does the following convey the same meaning?:
>> 
>> The quality of tests and test suites is most apparent not when
>> everything passes, but in how quickly bugs can be identified,
>> analyzed, and resolved after test failures occur.
>
> Yes, this reflects what I tried to say.

So, do you mind if I locally amended the log message, or should we
expect an updated patch sent to the list?  For a small thing like
this, either is fine by me.

Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-25 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-17 17:04 [PATCH] ci(dockerized): do show the result of failing tests again Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-11-17 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-23  2:41   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-18  9:36 ` Jeff King
2025-11-25  6:15 ` Elijah Newren
2025-11-25 14:32   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-25 17:40   ` Johannes Schindelin
2025-11-25 19:27     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-11-29 18:31       ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqsee1rjyx.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).