From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1459191 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2025 01:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760059167; cv=none; b=lXPE2rTtAUelVxYIdMIqgfqxvK/7ExXMo1lE5/LvgtTKr57oA3tPqgg7H+PMexYCIE94EEPDRh2j+qjjB1qAiUc0yWoL/dNidv6aeN8h1SsOHLStyxwvY/4zzNkH5lw9K6m0F+day/PCaAzWjnWGGXxjH/D/uMspKrLj7aWM+mU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760059167; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AehCWvlN19vinD3/4ettyijZpj95wyo3C0y5YgQ8nmI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f4Pk6H6Z5wPJ0KA7SHF00FP5zHrKPW6S4OqO1DbtqyzNC7dMiP7k03TwWad8fJjfyrXSffLFADWhLIxAeZKffIgBZ1FeRTwA+9CxvvlQckTxFlbyvFbdjt7ZnZeK6SvlyuJfDCZZEO5e5kX8coez+PF1uqY3M2tYgNs9c9kXb70= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=QvZ063Dc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=o/NZeCV7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="QvZ063Dc"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="o/NZeCV7" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B819C7A016D; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 21:19:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Oct 2025 21:19:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1760059164; x=1760145564; bh=9lR0Qa64zO 5aU+Ebf15nByfNj4WusjTcHKBzpSoDMEc=; b=QvZ063DcEIyz8rDvu1E1Ma0laM Y6u15qAjf4As9vmy1cxNhrWHCbSUg1+3O4Bkr/Onk0KAryr7lRQexUbLK3jZRlXR 8F8BC2eegKap8KqYcYAwiTT5A+qEzGemoGHf1L4njbSe1eN2ExlUKkSWF7oC/d6L jwrRPOOlDOL1thbrGm+w4LvoEGSnvePjQB59UH8Mbe/fPS6CcB1xsVyWZ7KQe26w i7V6JaTTx0NyPuFA0cOQVm3iUyp7Ym+8YYAVumxHZqDxd6H2G8UwAkoXh53PT5mz yby6hmH5XIDsdypAHPHyreLFLYPvMuO10kXyu5z6TXGnImvkkyoBLNel5iaw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1760059164; x=1760145564; bh=9lR0Qa64zO5aU+Ebf15nByfNj4WusjTcHKB zpSoDMEc=; b=o/NZeCV7vEH/5nvMvercHAnZrRJJS7rmslpT6XN1dPAzOSTvm+t /ya9VW+5AAa2sACUS9nU+Lcu3t6mdR4n56OvFJVFg2QGeL2ixLh/wqIHljDmgmza icp4FLP2+VID5o70WMomp2uKe90ozZ9cekpB0e0Ikskorlfi+kjZE1puASyKO10W 6+Mxn3FN+/3VNGPagLh2WuUskRVHyc+U/A6cWegtXpU1q2OhvhySb0BdJvPPVnkK hBG9yc3bmpliOseU9SmYvDFhtpVplKeoYmcFtgsn/yIeTOHPUo0RKHG8CVeSZRNt N0/3s+BNWcyfRQni+mJPzIlFiuOdLp2AUJQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddutdejjedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddupdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegthhhrihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhesghhmrg hilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhr tghpthhtohepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopehnvgifrhgvnhesghhmrghilh drtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehpvghffhesphgvfhhfrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepshgr nhgurghlshestghruhhsthihthhoohhthhhprghsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepjh hohhgrnhhnvghsrdhstghhihhnuggvlhhinhesghhmgidruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepthhm iiesphhosghogidrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegtohhllhhinhdrfhhunhhkudesghhmrg hilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 21:19:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Christian Couder Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt , Elijah Newren , Jeff King , "brian m . carlson" , Johannes Schindelin , Todd Zullinger , Collin Funk , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] doc: git-tag: stop focusing on GPG signed tags In-Reply-To: <20251009122457.1273701-2-christian.couder@gmail.com> (Christian Couder's message of "Thu, 9 Oct 2025 14:24:53 +0200") References: <20251007122958.1089680-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20251009122457.1273701-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20251009122457.1273701-2-christian.couder@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 18:19:22 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Christian Couder writes: > -s:: > --sign:: > - Make a GPG-signed tag, using the default e-mail address's key. > ... > + Make a cryptographically signed tag, using the default signing > ... > -u :: > --local-user=:: > - Make a GPG-signed tag, using the given key. > + Make a cryptographically signed tag using the given key. The Given the above ... > -v:: > --verify:: > - Verify the GPG signature of the given tag names. > + Verify the signature of the given tag names. ... it would be more consistent to say it with "cryptographic" somewhere. Also what we verify are "tags", not their names. So, something like Verify the cryptographic signature of the given tags. perhaps?