From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Derrick Stolee" <stolee@gmail.com>,
"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] tests: add test_todo() for known failures
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 10:05:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsfk0lw6c.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1374.git.1665068476.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 06 Oct 2022 15:01:13 +0000")
"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> test_todo() is intended as a fine grained alternative to
> test_expect_failure(). Rather than marking the whole test as failing
> test_todo() is used to mark individual failing commands within a test. This
> approach to writing failing tests allows us to detect unexpected failures
> that are hidden by test_expect_failure().
>
> This series attempts to keep most of the benefits test_expect_todo()
> previously proposed by Ævar[1] while being simpler to use.
Great. We discussed this some time ago and I am happy to see the
work re-ignited.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-06 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-06 15:01 [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] tests: add test_todo() for known failures Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-06 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] [RFC] tests: add test_todo() to mark known breakages Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-06 15:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-06 16:10 ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-06 20:33 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-06 22:37 ` Victoria Dye
2022-12-07 12:08 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-08 15:06 ` Phillip Wood
2022-12-09 1:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-12-09 9:04 ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-06 15:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] [RFC] test_todo: allow [!] grep as the command Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-06 15:56 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-06 16:42 ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-06 20:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-06 15:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] test_todo: allow [verbose] test " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-06 16:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-06 17:05 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-10-06 19:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] tests: add test_todo() for known failures Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-07 13:26 ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-07 17:08 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqsfk0lw6c.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).